Which is most important?
-
@mmasnick wrote "Protocols Not Platforms":
https://www.techdirt.com/2019/08/28/protocols-not-platforms-technological-approach-to-free-speech/
Our friends at @anewsocial have merch that says "People not Platforms":
This poll is finally determining once and for all what should be on top.
I threw in "Products" because it's a techy P-word and I figured it would fit in well with the rest.
-
@evan There is no utility in protocols, platforms, or products without the people
-
@evan There is no utility in protocols, platforms, or products without the people
@quillmatiq does that make people the most important part of the system?
-
@quillmatiq does that make people the most important part of the system?
@evan yes 🙂‍↕️! why would we be here if it weren't for the people we build communities with? When social platforms change for the worse, isn't our first reaction "but I don't want to leave my people"?
-
@evan yes 🙂‍↕️! why would we be here if it weren't for the people we build communities with? When social platforms change for the worse, isn't our first reaction "but I don't want to leave my people"?
@quillmatiq I tend to agree, but I'm disputing for the enjoyment of the question.
Without the products, platforms, and protocols, the people would be distant and isolated. Most communications devices are products. I think you could make a case that spoken language is a protocol.
Without communications, people are isolated. We're barely people in a meaningful sense.
-
@quillmatiq I tend to agree, but I'm disputing for the enjoyment of the question.
Without the products, platforms, and protocols, the people would be distant and isolated. Most communications devices are products. I think you could make a case that spoken language is a protocol.
Without communications, people are isolated. We're barely people in a meaningful sense.
@evan my assumption was that the context is online social networks rather than something broader! But, I think the point still stands that without people, the other P's hold no value, but people hold value regardless of all the other P's.
What is the value of a language if no one ever exists to speak it?
-
@quillmatiq I tend to agree, but I'm disputing for the enjoyment of the question.
Without the products, platforms, and protocols, the people would be distant and isolated. Most communications devices are products. I think you could make a case that spoken language is a protocol.
Without communications, people are isolated. We're barely people in a meaningful sense.
@quillmatiq emergent phenomena arise from networks of communicating, connected humans. Like cultures, religions, political movements, nation states. One term I've seen is intersubjectivity, the things that only exist between people:
-
@evan my assumption was that the context is online social networks rather than something broader! But, I think the point still stands that without people, the other P's hold no value, but people hold value regardless of all the other P's.
What is the value of a language if no one ever exists to speak it?
@quillmatiq yeah, it's a bit of rug pull to zoom out on other pre-Internet networks, like telephones, writing, and local newspapers.
-
@quillmatiq emergent phenomena arise from networks of communicating, connected humans. Like cultures, religions, political movements, nation states. One term I've seen is intersubjectivity, the things that only exist between people:
@quillmatiq I think it takes some extreme individualism, which definitely isn't universal, to say that a person is more important than their city, religion, or country.
(I think this is an extreme over-extension of my point, though. Even if emergent entities arise from Internet communications networks in the same way they did from pre-Internet communications networks, we're not at a point (yet?) where people are willing to put the good of their Subreddit above their own needs.)
-
@quillmatiq I think it takes some extreme individualism, which definitely isn't universal, to say that a person is more important than their city, religion, or country.
(I think this is an extreme over-extension of my point, though. Even if emergent entities arise from Internet communications networks in the same way they did from pre-Internet communications networks, we're not at a point (yet?) where people are willing to put the good of their Subreddit above their own needs.)
@evan I specifically didn't say "person", I said "people" 🙂
-
undefined evan@cosocial.ca shared this topic
-
@evan I specifically didn't say "person", I said "people" 🙂
@quillmatiq touché!