You don't need an account to explore Loops!
General Discussion
8
Posts
4
Posters
18
Views
-
You don't need an account to explore Loops!
Popular Feed: https://loops.video
Explore: https://loops.video/explore
Tag Feed: https://loops.video/tag/fyp
-
You don't need an account to explore Loops!
Popular Feed: https://loops.video
Explore: https://loops.video/explore
Tag Feed: https://loops.video/tag/fyp
@dansup congrats on the launch, looks good! But this "feature" copied from big tech kind of sucks. It's annoying and doesn't really align with the fediverse idea. :(
-
You don't need an account to explore Loops!
Popular Feed: https://loops.video
Explore: https://loops.video/explore
Tag Feed: https://loops.video/tag/fyp
@dansup Me: scroll a tiny bit on explore,
You: lies
-
@dansup congrats on the launch, looks good! But this "feature" copied from big tech kind of sucks. It's annoying and doesn't really align with the fediverse idea. :(
@jomo there is a really good reason behind this, we don't want to make it easy for (AI) crawlers to scrape our public endpoints, so we limit them, and while most software (like Pixelfed) just shows 10 or so results, I figured it would be better to indicate to the user there are more if they login.
-
@dansup Me: scroll a tiny bit on explore,
You: lies
-
@dansup Then don't say we don't need an account to explore it though
-
@dansup Then don't say we don't need an account to explore it though
@krafting you can explore without an account, we just simply limit it. Mastodon does this too.
-
You don't need an account to explore Loops!
Popular Feed: https://loops.video
Explore: https://loops.video/explore
Tag Feed: https://loops.video/tag/fyp
This post is deleted!
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
@incise Nice, great progress!
@weekinfediverse Is this on your radar?
-
And with this, I'm feature freezing new developments.
The focus now is solely on improving the UI, lots of rough edges everywhere! It has a good foundation, and needs to be refined continuously.
-
I've been working all day today improving, fixing, and enhancing the comments system in Incise.
- Comments are now correctly listed for #ActivityPub fetches
- Comments are now likable from the web UI as well as through #ActivityPub
- Comment replies are now #federated as well
- Comments by remote actors (eg. Mastodon users) liked by Incise users are now #federatedAn example of the last point, this comment by @Viditb on @dezinezync's post: https://mastodon.social/@Viditb/115960081954678201/favourites
-
@wjmaggos@liberal.city I think that thinking of "anything" being boostable is both weird and expected at the same time. We hold these thoughts in our heads concurrently because it was how the web-at-large (indieweb notwithstanding) worked.
What I mean is...
A news article isn't a discrete resource shared on a common social web — such a construct does not exist outside of the Fediverse.
... but news articles are littered with "share via..." buttons that sort of approximate the experience.
-
Is social media its own thing or is it an attention layer for the open web? Is it mostly about these separate things we call posts, or should every piece of writing or audio or video be able to be boosted itself?
I think that's the divide between #ATproto and #ActivityPub. #bluesky wants to dominate a world of posts like Gmail dominates email etc. Social running on a protocol but one company decides most people's experience. Or should we give the public full control over what media goes viral?
-
The Quiet app provides high-level technical details of how their app works:
https://github.com/TryQuiet/quiet/#technical-overview
This is actually very similar to one way I imagined a more server-less peer-based usage of ActivitiyPub working.
-
We're not currently doing anything around spam because it's not really a specification issue. There has been a few projects in this space, but when I've tested them they've left a lot to be desired. I can't remember specific names off top of head now though because it's been at least 6 months since I did that reaearch
