Trying to better understand ATproto and Activitypub similarities and differences.
-
Trying to better understand ATproto and Activitypub similarities and differences.
People here with recent reading/listening/watch tips?
#fediverse #eurosky #bluesky #activitypub #ATProto #Mastodon -
Trying to better understand ATproto and Activitypub similarities and differences.
People here with recent reading/listening/watch tips?
#fediverse #eurosky #bluesky #activitypub #ATProto #Mastodon@douwe@waag.social Christine Lemmer-Webber did a great analysis a while ago:
https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/
It's a great place to start.
-
System moved this topic from General Discussion
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@douwe@waag.social Christine Lemmer-Webber did a great analysis a while ago:
https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/
It's a great place to start.
-
Trying to better understand ATproto and Activitypub similarities and differences.
People here with recent reading/listening/watch tips?
#fediverse #eurosky #bluesky #activitypub #ATProto #Mastodon
-
definitely not a fan of this. tbh, there should just not be a global feed that new accounts see, because they see a lot of stuff they don't understand or know the community norms for, and that leads to bad engagement.
-
There is the Web Share API, and the future Web Share Targets API, but I think we could also align Web Share with FedCM and be able to say "I want to share to this type of application"
-
@reiver i think the disjunction between Object and Link was actually unnecessary. https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/666
i also think there's too much emphasis on types when there really shouldn't be -- it's the *properties* that you end up using almost all of the time. pretty much the only types that actually matter are the Activity types (because you can't infer those).
-
-
@reiver Did you and I discuss queryfy a while ago, or was it one of my other projects?
Just wondering whether I owe you a heads up since queryfy has been bumped up to v0.3.0
-
With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...
To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.
That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) — since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.
I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.
...
It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.
