Is the Risorgimento an important part of Canadian history?

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@Anibyl I think the Wikipedia article can help. This one too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_diaspora

[virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca]

@evan @Anibyl
I searched for "cana" and got zero hits and refuse to put more effort into finding a Canadian connection.

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@virtuous_sloth @Anibyl ha, fair!

Let me ask a similar question to an Elrick, then, which is: Are the Highland Clearances an important part of Canadian history?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highland_Clearances

[virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca]

@evan @Anibyl
Let me ask you a different question. If there is one person from each country who lives in each other country (less than 200^2 = 40,000 people), then does using a country as an adjective modifying the word history have any meaning anymore?

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@virtuous_sloth @Anibyl Answer mine first!

[virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca]

@evan @Anibyl
Mine goes to the legitimacy and utility of yours!

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@virtuous_sloth @Anibyl I promised you neither legitimacy nor utility!

[spraoi@tooting.ch]

@evan Yes, but very few people understand that.

The impact was almost the same as it was on Western Switzerland (Romandie) but it's more obvious here, with statues to Garabaldi and Pestalozzi etc.

[virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca]

@evan @Anibyl
Touché.

And I promised you no answer!

[virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca]

@evan @Anibyl
But my answer was no.

[anibyl@social.coop]

@evan I don't think that major events in other countries that that contributed to immigration are important parts of Canadian history. Like Russian Revolution isn't. It's important to understand the causes on the global scale, but it's not really a part of what happened here.

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@Anibyl So, Canadian history is everything that happened inside the current borders of Canada?

[anibyl@social.coop]

@evan Mainly? Otherwise, what's the point of it being Canadian?

If you take a course on quantum mechanics, classical mechanics won't be an important part of it — but it'd be referenced and compared to.

You can't just pile everything together — sometimes it's important to focus.

[carkner@glammr.us]

@Anibyl @evan

as a historian I disagree heh.

I don't have a strong opinion about the Italy thing, but ..
look up the New Imperial History school of thought which discusses how economic and population forces work at great distances affecting and defining local history in ways which were previously ignored. it's a whole thing.

[anibyl@social.coop]

@carkner @evan Would you even define such a thing as “Canadian history” in this framework?

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@carkner @Anibyl I think there are very few Canadian historians who would say that the Battle of Vimy Ridge wasn't an important part of Canadian history even though it happened off Canadian soil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vimy_Ridge

[anibyl@social.coop]

@evan @carkner Because it was? I never said the soil was the only defining factor, but you have to draw the line somewhere if you're trying to divide the global history into national parts.

[tassoman@orwell.fun]

@evan@cosocial.ca I voted yes by pure parochialism. W l'italia! BTW Canadian Corps made a great job during WWII, fighting against nazi at Linea Gotica.

[carkner@glammr.us]

@Anibyl @evan

yes, this kind of stuff gets taught in Canadian history courses. diaspora, imperial trade and migration networks, all that stuff.

[villasbc@mastodon.social]

@evan No, but… many of its ramifications are so it makes sense to know more about it to know more about Canada.

Could also have answered Yes, but… not in the intuitive sense of “being a part of”, because everything is so interconnected that any major event with global ramifications is a part of the entire worlds history so not sure the definition is very useful colloquially?