Ignore this toot just testing something.#FreeBSD
Uncategorized
32
Posts
9
Posters
4
Views
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@marzlberger @justine @alelab I can see this. I've just disabled the public disclosure of external messages. I mean: you can't see external instances' posts using the BSD Cafe server if you're not logged in. This because I've seen some bad contents (posts without CWs, porn, illegal stuff) being served by the BSD Cafe (not by BSD Cafe users) and publicly available. I'll make a public post about this.
-
@marzlberger @justine @alelab I can see this. I've just disabled the public disclosure of external messages. I mean: you can't see external instances' posts using the BSD Cafe server if you're not logged in. This because I've seen some bad contents (posts without CWs, porn, illegal stuff) being served by the BSD Cafe (not by BSD Cafe users) and publicly available. I'll make a public post about this.
-
@marzlberger @justine @alelab Administration/Server Settings/Public Timelines (look at the screenshot)
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
There are still so many features that had been introduced there (client-side includes with fallback, “everything is a link”, etc) that are still sorely missing 8-(
I wonder if there was also a growing dislike for XML in general behind this choice? (hurr durr namespace confusing). It's ironic that we have to thank MS for pushing for the little support of XML in browsers we still have (and they are now working on removing 8-/).
-
IIRC the WHATWG was set up before Google had its own browser (I think it was Mozilla + Opera + Apple at the time?) and it almost made sense, although there was no reason to ditch XHTML 2.0 altogether. What really drives me mad is that EVEN IF one could consider the XEvent and XForms interface to be suboptimal for the kind of “dynamic” web that was being pushed (possibly by Google behind the scenes) that was really no reason to throw away the whole of XHTML 2.
-
Must see from @euronews
Fact check: Is the EU launching a social media platform called #WSocial?
"A spokesperson for the European Commission told The Cube, Euronews' fact-checking team, that the EU is not launching or funding any social media platform, and that there is currently no EU-backed project called "W"
[...] W is a privately owned social media start-up incorporated in Sweden, backed by private investors mainly from the Nordic region."
Please share widely
-
@aeva My thoughts on the moon...
-
Nella cattolicissima #Malta è in vigore la legge sull'#aborto più retriva d'Europa. Mentre la società civile chiede una norma più laica il governo prova a uscire dall'imbarazzo promettendo la grazia per le donne condannate per interruzione di gravidanza.👇
https://www.quotidiano.net/luce/attualita/aborto-malta-8bd29db4
-
Does this mean that capitalism is about making money and not defending rights?
Wow, who would have ever thought...
-
By the way, whenever I'm in the West, my confidence in my English speaking really takes a hit. I have a hard time understanding people if they speak even a little bit fast, and I feel like communication is a struggle because my own accent is so strong. 😩
