Switch to a European OSAdvice No 002Digital Sovereignty Council
Uncategorized
3
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
Switch to a European OS
Advice No 002
Digital Sovereignty Council -
Switch to a European OS
Advice No 002
Digital Sovereignty Council@leanderlindahl done that
-
Switch to a European OS
Advice No 002
Digital Sovereignty Council@leanderlindahl shout out to my boy opensuse
-
undefined 77nn@goto.77nn.it shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@cancel I wonder how this applies (if at all) to procgen art and other non-destructive digital art workflows in general
-
Quante lamentele. Qui da noi non ci sono problemi visto che "dietro ogni grande uomo c'è una grande donna e a casa comanda mia moglie" (cit. giornalista a Sanremo).
#EU, nel 2024, salgono al 35,2 per cento le donne in ruoli manageriali, ma l’#Italia è fanalino di coda: I dati di Eurostat https://www.eunews.it/2026/03/02/ue-nel-2024-salgono-al-352-per-cento-le-donne-in-ruoli-manageriali-ma-litalia-e-fanalino-di-coda-i-dati-di-eurostat/
-
@bbacc
Io giudico un oggetto "schifoso" (che è pur sempre un oggetto), tu giudichi di "pessimo gusto" un atteggiamento altrui.
Ora la domanda che mi sovviene è: quale dei due giudizi è più incentrato e diretto verso (contro?) una persona?
-
@0ciX_revoluti0ns scena tipo Madagascar con le persone che si trasformano in biscotti come lì gli animali in bistecche
-
@sundogplanets I hope the vibes that were in my head helped and that you have survived the experience.
-
Current* conditions near Alpena, MI:
-
@YvanDaSilva @starchturrets @ariadne I'm high enough up in the company that I work for that I'm able to tell the next level up that if they pull that sort of shit, I'm out, and that has enough weight that they haven't.
I am counting my lucking fucking stars.
-
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear the AI copyright case. So, the new Copyright Office guidance that says the output of prompting systems that produce art, sound, text, etc., cannot be copyrighted, no matter how many times the human re-prompts or iterates the system, is upheld: https://www.theverge.com/policy/887678/supreme-court-ai-art-copyright
(Guidance from Copyright Office: https://copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf )
So, unless I'm misunderstanding something…
1) If your corporate codebase is written with AI, and it leaks to the public, too bad -- no copyright protections. People can take it and use it.
2) AI generated code is incompatible with GPL and GPL-like projects, because GPL requires copyright to be assigned in order to enforce the license.
Is that really what's happening? Am I misunderstanding something here?
