Salta al contenuto

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

I’ve received many reactions to my latest blog post.

  • EDIT: I've posted this - that will clarify even more things: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/10/10/when-bigger-stops-being-better/

    I’ve received many reactions to my latest blog post. Some constructive, others critical, but all useful to better understand different perspectives.
    However, two recurring dynamics emerged in the comments (mostly outside the Fediverse).

    First: I didn’t mention any names. I understand the disappointment, but naming them wouldn’t have helped anyone. Before publishing, I did my homework - that draft had been ready for over a year - and I even asked some of the people involved.
    They took action privately to warn friends and colleagues, with good results, but they didn’t want public exposure. Many years have passed, and that company no longer has the same relevance anyway.
    Some understood my choice (naming them could have meant serious legal trouble for me), but others started quoting US laws and amendments to "prove" that I could have safely done it. What many don’t realize is that the world isn’t the United States - not everyone plays by the same legal rules. And even if I won such a case, it would still mean wasted time, energy, and peace of mind. Cui prodest?

    Second: "Stories like that can only happen in Italy because there are so many small, family-run businesses".
    That one annoyed me more - especially because it often came from Italians themselves.
    First of all, I’ve worked in several countries, and I never said the story was about an Italian company.
    Second, small businesses are not a problem - they’re a strength. My experience taught me that large corporations tend to turn employees into replaceable parts of a giant machine. Customers become faceless numbers, almost subjects rather than clients. At some point, a company’s need for endless growth becomes a trap - not a service that enriches people’s lives, but a "necessary evil".
    And that, to me, is the real danger: believing that bigger automatically means better - in tech, and in life.
    I wrote about this a few months ago, and I still believe it even more strongly today: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/06/09/macbook-pro-vs-car-why-small-businesses-still-win/

  • EDIT: I've posted this - that will clarify even more things: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/10/10/when-bigger-stops-being-better/

    I’ve received many reactions to my latest blog post. Some constructive, others critical, but all useful to better understand different perspectives.
    However, two recurring dynamics emerged in the comments (mostly outside the Fediverse).

    First: I didn’t mention any names. I understand the disappointment, but naming them wouldn’t have helped anyone. Before publishing, I did my homework - that draft had been ready for over a year - and I even asked some of the people involved.
    They took action privately to warn friends and colleagues, with good results, but they didn’t want public exposure. Many years have passed, and that company no longer has the same relevance anyway.
    Some understood my choice (naming them could have meant serious legal trouble for me), but others started quoting US laws and amendments to "prove" that I could have safely done it. What many don’t realize is that the world isn’t the United States - not everyone plays by the same legal rules. And even if I won such a case, it would still mean wasted time, energy, and peace of mind. Cui prodest?

    Second: "Stories like that can only happen in Italy because there are so many small, family-run businesses".
    That one annoyed me more - especially because it often came from Italians themselves.
    First of all, I’ve worked in several countries, and I never said the story was about an Italian company.
    Second, small businesses are not a problem - they’re a strength. My experience taught me that large corporations tend to turn employees into replaceable parts of a giant machine. Customers become faceless numbers, almost subjects rather than clients. At some point, a company’s need for endless growth becomes a trap - not a service that enriches people’s lives, but a "necessary evil".
    And that, to me, is the real danger: believing that bigger automatically means better - in tech, and in life.
    I wrote about this a few months ago, and I still believe it even more strongly today: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/06/09/macbook-pro-vs-car-why-small-businesses-still-win/

    @stefano excellent post, I wholeheartedly agree. When we buy from small businesses we:
    - talk directly to the owner, always someone who cares, put their hearts at work, are proud about doing it well, and have their lives dependent on it
    - do not pay for unexplainable overheads and time-lags, and will definitely not been led by the nose into nonsensical labyrints of buzzwords, lingo, meetings, powerpoint, and bureaucracy
    - contribute to the local economy

    Long live small businesses 🙂 !

  • Stefano Marinelliundefined Stefano Marinelli ha condiviso questa discussione
  • @stefano excellent post, I wholeheartedly agree. When we buy from small businesses we:
    - talk directly to the owner, always someone who cares, put their hearts at work, are proud about doing it well, and have their lives dependent on it
    - do not pay for unexplainable overheads and time-lags, and will definitely not been led by the nose into nonsensical labyrints of buzzwords, lingo, meetings, powerpoint, and bureaucracy
    - contribute to the local economy

    Long live small businesses 🙂 !

    @hdeangelis exactly!

  • EDIT: I've posted this - that will clarify even more things: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/10/10/when-bigger-stops-being-better/

    I’ve received many reactions to my latest blog post. Some constructive, others critical, but all useful to better understand different perspectives.
    However, two recurring dynamics emerged in the comments (mostly outside the Fediverse).

    First: I didn’t mention any names. I understand the disappointment, but naming them wouldn’t have helped anyone. Before publishing, I did my homework - that draft had been ready for over a year - and I even asked some of the people involved.
    They took action privately to warn friends and colleagues, with good results, but they didn’t want public exposure. Many years have passed, and that company no longer has the same relevance anyway.
    Some understood my choice (naming them could have meant serious legal trouble for me), but others started quoting US laws and amendments to "prove" that I could have safely done it. What many don’t realize is that the world isn’t the United States - not everyone plays by the same legal rules. And even if I won such a case, it would still mean wasted time, energy, and peace of mind. Cui prodest?

    Second: "Stories like that can only happen in Italy because there are so many small, family-run businesses".
    That one annoyed me more - especially because it often came from Italians themselves.
    First of all, I’ve worked in several countries, and I never said the story was about an Italian company.
    Second, small businesses are not a problem - they’re a strength. My experience taught me that large corporations tend to turn employees into replaceable parts of a giant machine. Customers become faceless numbers, almost subjects rather than clients. At some point, a company’s need for endless growth becomes a trap - not a service that enriches people’s lives, but a "necessary evil".
    And that, to me, is the real danger: believing that bigger automatically means better - in tech, and in life.
    I wrote about this a few months ago, and I still believe it even more strongly today: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/06/09/macbook-pro-vs-car-why-small-businesses-still-win/

    Hi @stefano, this story and the way you depicted it immediately remind me the Register.com "OnCall" stories (you should try to send them one or two :p ).

    The Reg also don't put names or countries on their stories, and nobody blame them for that or say gibberish about Brit companies.

    So, to me, none of those remarks are relevant.

  • EDIT: I've posted this - that will clarify even more things: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/10/10/when-bigger-stops-being-better/

    I’ve received many reactions to my latest blog post. Some constructive, others critical, but all useful to better understand different perspectives.
    However, two recurring dynamics emerged in the comments (mostly outside the Fediverse).

    First: I didn’t mention any names. I understand the disappointment, but naming them wouldn’t have helped anyone. Before publishing, I did my homework - that draft had been ready for over a year - and I even asked some of the people involved.
    They took action privately to warn friends and colleagues, with good results, but they didn’t want public exposure. Many years have passed, and that company no longer has the same relevance anyway.
    Some understood my choice (naming them could have meant serious legal trouble for me), but others started quoting US laws and amendments to "prove" that I could have safely done it. What many don’t realize is that the world isn’t the United States - not everyone plays by the same legal rules. And even if I won such a case, it would still mean wasted time, energy, and peace of mind. Cui prodest?

    Second: "Stories like that can only happen in Italy because there are so many small, family-run businesses".
    That one annoyed me more - especially because it often came from Italians themselves.
    First of all, I’ve worked in several countries, and I never said the story was about an Italian company.
    Second, small businesses are not a problem - they’re a strength. My experience taught me that large corporations tend to turn employees into replaceable parts of a giant machine. Customers become faceless numbers, almost subjects rather than clients. At some point, a company’s need for endless growth becomes a trap - not a service that enriches people’s lives, but a "necessary evil".
    And that, to me, is the real danger: believing that bigger automatically means better - in tech, and in life.
    I wrote about this a few months ago, and I still believe it even more strongly today: https://my-notes.dragas.net/2025/06/09/macbook-pro-vs-car-why-small-businesses-still-win/

    @stefano I can't directly compare it, but in France, we have some similar problems and corruption affects big and small corporations. So yes, your observations are right and it's not only happening in Italy :)

  • Hi @stefano, this story and the way you depicted it immediately remind me the Register.com "OnCall" stories (you should try to send them one or two :p ).

    The Reg also don't put names or countries on their stories, and nobody blame them for that or say gibberish about Brit companies.

    So, to me, none of those remarks are relevant.

    @fosdembsd thank you.

  • @stefano I can't directly compare it, but in France, we have some similar problems and corruption affects big and small corporations. So yes, your observations are right and it's not only happening in Italy :)

    @vinishor @stefano Having lived in both the US and France, I can confidently say there's no shortage of similar corruption in both countries. Significantly worse in the US.

  • @vinishor @stefano Having lived in both the US and France, I can confidently say there's no shortage of similar corruption in both countries. Significantly worse in the US.

    @tfb @vinishor thank you!


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti