@davidgerard I thought Linus Torvalds was not anti AI?
Uncategorized
48
Posts
36
Posters
0
Views
-
@davidgerard When ‘buttplugs4life4me’ is the voice of reason
-
@davidgerard Does it murder your files and bury them in a shallow grave like that other filesystem?
-
> they've been conditioned to not think of themselves as sentient or having feelings
```
>>> experience_sentience = False
```OK, that should keep my Python interpreter confined
@pikesley @davidgerard "I'd know the difference!"
"No you wouldn't, you'd be programmed not to."
-
@davidgerard that post is a *goldmine*
-
@davidgerard I have no idea if it was *before* that. But it kills any notion of it ever coming to anything from this point on, yes.
@lispi314 @davidgerard It worked pretty well in my experience. Unfortunately, thanks to this I'll be getting rid of my bcachefs volume as soon as I have time to go get my backup server (backups are current, but I'm not going to be restoring 20 TB of data over the internet).
-
@davidgerard ahahahahaahhahaaaahahahahhahhhaaahahahahaahaahahahahaahahahhahaahaaahahaha
-
@kaasbaas @davidgerard The wonders of the steam age! vibecoding a filesystem!
A filesystem.
A filesystem.
Not something casual and relaxed like a DBMS, something important that absolutely, positively, MUST be correct.
Vibecoding a filesystem.
RE: https://oldbytes.space/@millihertz/116114185887608466
@uastronomer @kaasbaas @davidgerard yeah, that was my reaction
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@admiralwonderboat [insert bot comment here]
-
If your going to make a bot account can you at least make it error free ? Errors or missing text just kind of kill the illusion you know ? Even if I really want to believe !
#bots #mastodon
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
FM 3-0 (#USA) e AJP-3 (#NATO) consentono pre-emptive strikes contro minacce imminenti (Caroline test), non preventive. Esempio: "launch under attack" o "pre-emptive degrade" se indicatori multipli (fuelling + RF).
È una "corsa contro il tempo" asimmetrica: #Russia ha vantaggio posizione, NATO ha superiorità intel/sensori. Un falso allarme = potenziale apocalisse. Per questo prevalgono diplomazia/blocco, non strikes casuali. La pace regge sul terrore condiviso.
(Perplexity)
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Finestra di reazione
Segnali rilevati: satelliti/radar vedono fueling o erezione TEL in 30-60 secondi.
Conferma intel: analisti/IA validano in 30-90 secondi (2-3 indicatori).
Decisione e lancio strike: ordini catena comando + volo armi NATO (es. F-35 da base Polonia o ATACMS): 1-2 minuti max.
Totale: hai 1-3 minuti per distruggere il lanciatore prima che il missile decolli. Oltre, è intercettazione disperata (Patriot ha ~70% vs ipersonici).
Fonte: Perplexity
-
@JorisMeys You could use Crossref metadata. Point them to api.crossref.org and explore millions of records about different scholarly content
