@glyph Did you quote post something?
Uncategorized
903
Posts
312
Posters
9.5k
Views
-
@agowa338 @tymwol @glyph I've done some experimentation and I found the tools to be extremely powerful in the way having a tracked excavator is more powerful than a hand shovel. Perhaps applying it takes some skill, but it magnifies human effort quite a lot. I've grown quite concerned that many people really underestimate the impact these tools are having and will have on a secular trend of power shifting away from labor.
I did some experiments too. I was actually quite happy with the very first version of ChatGPT. But any iteration on it just made it less capable and worse. They optimized it for cost which heavily impacted advanced capabilities that I enjoyed.
Same for codegen. I initially thought of it as advanced Intelisense. But then the more I (tried to) use it it just become more and more annoying as it didn't even manage to suggest the right APIs of the project itself.
-
Oh and all of them failed hilariously when I tasked them with doing some negative code edits. Like typical cleanup tasks where you'd replace large chunks of codes with a single API call.
-
And I think it also had some Syntax issues. But I don't remember which programming language I tried to use it with. Probably something PowerShell or C# isch but could have been something else too...
-
@agowa338 @tymwol @glyph It's interesting, this doesn't at all line up with my experience. The tools I tried were able to translate ~1 paragraph of instruction about a change into a point by point plan with references, correctly enough to need very few edits, and then to execute it in one go. Similarly, to take a pasted error (I tried a few, the interesting one was a infrequently manifesting concurrency problem), diagnose two likely causes, and patch.
-
@agowa338 @tymwol @glyph It's interesting, this doesn't at all line up with my experience. The tools I tried were able to translate ~1 paragraph of instruction about a change into a point by point plan with references, correctly enough to need very few edits, and then to execute it in one go. Similarly, to take a pasted error (I tried a few, the interesting one was a infrequently manifesting concurrency problem), diagnose two likely causes, and patch.
@mirth @agowa338 @tymwol sometimes it does amazing things, sometimes it wastes hours of your time. is it a net benefit? unclear. it sure *does stuff* but I haven't yet seen anything that indicates it reliably does enough stuff correctly to be an improvement to efficiency. c.f.: https://blog.glyph.im/2025/08/futzing-fraction.html
-
@mirth @agowa338 @tymwol sometimes it does amazing things, sometimes it wastes hours of your time. is it a net benefit? unclear. it sure *does stuff* but I haven't yet seen anything that indicates it reliably does enough stuff correctly to be an improvement to efficiency. c.f.: https://blog.glyph.im/2025/08/futzing-fraction.html
@mirth @agowa338 @tymwol more broadly speaking, there are some strong indications that on balance it isn't delivering on its promise. A recent roundup from @davidgerard: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/09/09/if-ai-coding-is-so-good-where-are-the-little-apps/
-
@glyph Ow, this "title butchering" is really concerning…
-
@mirth @agowa338 @tymwol more broadly speaking, there are some strong indications that on balance it isn't delivering on its promise. A recent roundup from @davidgerard: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/09/09/if-ai-coding-is-so-good-where-are-the-little-apps/
@glyph @agowa338 @tymwol @davidgerard Your post is very well framed. I think you can simplify the equation to C/PH because I, W, and E are each approximately zero, and as you point out it's tricky to estimate the other numbers. If we assume for a second well-framed problems have P close to 1.0 (I suspect this is true), the major variability is C/H which I expect to be highly variable dependent similar to how some areas are easier to mechanically test than others.
-
@glyph @agowa338 @tymwol @davidgerard Your post is very well framed. I think you can simplify the equation to C/PH because I, W, and E are each approximately zero, and as you point out it's tricky to estimate the other numbers. If we assume for a second well-framed problems have P close to 1.0 (I suspect this is true), the major variability is C/H which I expect to be highly variable dependent similar to how some areas are easier to mechanically test than others.
@glyph @agowa338 @tymwol @davidgerard What I am most concerned about are what in the post you categorize as harm to the humans and 2nd order effects. I think these get to be much more concerning as the underlying tools get more effective, and I'm not sure how to even mitigate those problems. If we look at how mass media and social media have melted people's brains a bit...
-
@glyph the story in four acts we are about to see (just one example, but could be Wikipedia, or anything else as well)
-
@agowa338 @glyph @tymwol @davidgerard Is there data on that? Acknowledging that this is anecdote, I see non-programmers in my extended work and social world trying to build little apps for whatever personal purpose that I don't think they would have attempted a couple years ago. I don't think most of them even know what StackOverflow is. (and their inspiration may be all about marketing rather than actual experience, so we will see how they fare)
-
@glyph I know they have a policy about retitling posts to avoid click bait in some cases, but it seems to be a failure of reading comprehension to take this as clickbait and a joke in the introductory paragraphs to be the ‘answer’. And then extremely bad faith to then take that non-answer as a dogwhistle.
-
@mirth @agowa338 @tymwol more broadly speaking, there are some strong indications that on balance it isn't delivering on its promise. A recent roundup from @davidgerard: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/09/09/if-ai-coding-is-so-good-where-are-the-little-apps/
@glyph @mirth @agowa338 @tymwol @davidgerard
Maybe the 10x coders are those that couldn't code before?
-
@glyph Ow, this "title butchering" is really concerning…
@krono it's not an *entirely* unfair attempt at summarization but if I wanted people to get mad at me for somebody else naming my articles I'd go work for a newspaper
-
@krono it's not an *entirely* unfair attempt at summarization but if I wanted people to get mad at me for somebody else naming my articles I'd go work for a newspaper
@glyph Fair.
-
@glyph I know they have a policy about retitling posts to avoid click bait in some cases, but it seems to be a failure of reading comprehension to take this as clickbait and a joke in the introductory paragraphs to be the ‘answer’. And then extremely bad faith to then take that non-answer as a dogwhistle.
@benjamineskola As I said in other replies on lobsters, I absolutely understand how everyone can be on a hair trigger about fascist shit these days so I am definitely not judging anyone for getting upset. They are for sure not _correct_ but also it is, a little bit, on me for not addressing this explicitly earlier.
-
@glyph I have a friend who spent the last year+ battling a kratom addiction. I get the analogy, and why you chose it, but using an addiction framing to talk about LLM usage is an analogy that risks really trivializing addiction (Is there a biological, genetic component to LLM usage? Is LLM usage linked to underlying psychological disorders like anxiety and depression?). I understand how you got here, and don’t think you’re wrong exactly, but I do wish you hadn’t made this argument.
@jacob @glyph couldn't there easily be an actual physical addiction to LLMs, same as with social media / "checking your phone" => dopamine releases => resistance => need to increased usage (cycle of addiction) ?
I would also guess from all the bad news that LLMs in relation to other areas in which it enters people's lives would produce similar cycles of addiction that also involves anxiety and depression.
-
@glyph got to love the folks going "the only right answer is one that assumes a 4k monitor" like 1080p monitors aren't still incredibly common devices.
-
@glyph if there is anything you would regret not doing, I recommend focusing on that
-
@glyph I feel so seen with the Pomodouroboros option, but also I voted for all of them so 🤷
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@mcc “八人入” isn’t wrong, but it feels incomplete — like “eight people enter...” and then you wait for the rest.
“八人入众” is more satisfying. It means “eight people enter a crowd” — a complete image, and a great start for a story.
To me, it feels like the opening of a wuxia (武侠 martial arts) tale.
In wuxia, heroes often disappear into crowds before they act. So “eight people enter a crowd” already makes me curious: who are they? what happens next?Thanks for sharing ！
-
Ehi Fediverso italiano!
Aiutiamo l'amico di @wohali a trovare un appartamento a Padova!
-
@mcc I'm so glad you found a fix!
-
don’t you understand? having constant LLM interruptions while you’re typing, suggestions appearing that you cannot help but read and try to parse
IS LITERALLY INTERRUPTING YOUR EVERY THOUGHT
and shaping the outcome whether you “accept” it or not
you cannot think clearly
you are becoming less You
-
@mcc I have to wonder if this is downstream of Unicode's choices around CJK unification. Because I seem to remember reading that it ended up causing some situations where, in order to correctly render a block of text, you need out-of-band knowledge of which language it's in.
-
@jonathankoren ゲ ✓ @mcc @rk
-
@QasimRashid Quite wonderful, isn't it?
-
Why is Don Draper such a little bitch?
