Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

i made some small portable windows apps and put them up for free.

Uncategorized
135 27 1

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @budfox ma infatti!!! Bonjour 😘

    read more

  • @lorcon @d10c4n3 @andre123

    perché fai già il passo a «schierarsi dalla parte di qualcuno»? Il giudizio su un conflitto si può valutare anche senza prendere parti (anzi).

    > E se si vuole fare la genesi dei conflitti siamo così sicuri che la narrazione aggredito/aggressore possa realmente reggere?

    In genere sí. Esitono casi piú e casi meno netti, ma in genere è abbastanza chiaro.

    > Chi è l'aggredito e chi è l'aggressore tra Iran e Israele

    Israele.

    read more

  • @d10c4n3 senza escludere che le riforme sulla architettura giudiziaria possano essere indispensabili, non possiamo escludere nemmeno che sia sufficiente il combinato disposto delle leggi ordinarie e dei dispositivi di bilancio necessari per ottenere una giustizia più efficiente, più digitalizzata, più finanziata, meno politicizzata e più giusta (ad esempio abolendo reati criminogeni legati al consumo ricreativo di cannabis, ai rave party, alle migrazioni irregolari o alle querele temerarie).

    read more

  • @oblomov gli stati servono a fare gli interessi delle classi dominanti su di un dato territorio. Gli interessi tra chi domina diversi territori sono contrastanti e negli ultimi anni abbiamo visto il ritorno a una concezione territorialista dei conflitti con una conquista diretta del suolo. Perché uno dovrebbe schierarsi con un aspirante dominatore o con un altro aspirante tale? E se si vuole fare la genesi dei conflitti siamo così sicuri che la narrazione aggredito/aggressore possa realmente reggere? Chi è l'aggredito e chi è l'aggressore tra Iran e Israele, e magari la Turchia, stati che hanno entrambi una forte spinta espansionista sugli stessi territori? @d10c4n3 @andre123

    read more

  • @nwalfield @fesshole actually no. An irrational number whose expansion includes all possible integers as subsequence is called a normal number, not all irrational numbers are normal; in fact, not even all transcendental numbers are normal. In fact (bis), pi and e are only CONJECTURED to be normal. No proof of their normality has ever been given.

    read more

  • @carnage4life This is why tech workers need more unions. Enshittification is here, and if we don't act fast it will eat our jobs right along-side how it has eaten the internet.

    read more

  • Studiate sempre tutte le materie anche quelle che non servono a niente mi raccomando! Ahaha scherzo studiare è importante ciao prof

    read more

  • Every AI power user I know in big tech is stressed about how the technology will impact tech jobs. If people are 2x - 10x more productive with AI or can now do work outside their core skills ( PMs creating designs or designers writing code) how do job roles and the workforce change?

    Will these changes be net positive or negative?

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    10 Views
    Thank you to our Friends of #GNOME for their invaluable financial support to the GNOME Foundation!If you want to join Friends of GNOME, you might consider becoming a recurring donor today. However, don't worry if you forget, you will get a notification! 😉https://donate.gnome.org/#OpenSource #FLOSS #FOSS #Linux
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    33 Views
    @mathieui@piaille.fr Thanks for engaging with this. I appreciate the pushback, and I think some of your concerns are worth taking seriously. That said, I want to clarify something about my position: TGPL (or any specific licensing mechanism) is just one possible avenue among many. The broader argument isn't tied to any single instrument. Regulatory pressure on governments to mandate that models trained on public data be returned to the public, expanded public funding for open research infrastructure, international treaty reform—these are all on the table. The point is strategic pluralism, not a bet on one tool. On the copyright concern: yes, major players have shown contempt for copyright. But that's precisely why I think purely technical or market-based solutions are insufficient, and why political and legislative pressure matters. The history of generic medicine access is instructive here—no single mechanism won that fight, but the combination of compulsory licensing advocacy, treaty pressure, and public funding reform produced real change over time. Now, your Luddite parallel: I actually think it argues for my position rather than against it. You're right that the weavers never reclaimed the technology. But the lesson I draw from that isn't “therefore reclamation is impossible.” It's that refusing or destroying the means of production doesn't work. What eventually produced change was organized labor movements that took the existence of that technology as a given and fought over who controls it and under what conditions. That's exactly the kind of struggle I'm advocating for here. The real question you're raising, I think, is about the subject: is there an organized political force capable of carrying this through? That's a fair and hard question. But it's an argument for building that force, not for abandoning the goal.
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    50 Views
    @amirbkhan 2/2Both implementations of democracy and the ideal are constantly under threat. Now more than any time in my lifetime.The nature of #freesoftware and #opensource is to be against closed, proprietary systems. Tools for individuals. It has ALWAYS been a resistance to closed, proprietary systems. In that regard, it echoes more #volunteerism than #democracy. That it is a tool democracy can and should use should not be conflated, imho.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    22 Views
    ownCloud: il tuo #cloud privato, sicuro e personale #opensource #sicurezza @diggita @opensource https://webappsmagazine.blogspot.com/2025/10/owncloud-il-tuo-cloud-privato-sicuro-e.html