Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

you ever think about hair

Uncategorized
25 7 21

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    0 Views
    @DarioZanette metti pure nel gruppo @spettacoli di @diggita questo:@spettacoli@diggita.com è comunque l'eurovision, il sanremo europeo, lasciamo @attualita ai temi più seri di geopolitica ;)
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    "Eniko are you talking about [specific instance]"No this just keeps happening. Someone comes up with an idea for a hashtag and people get involved and it's a positive thing for participants and then the people "in charge" (even though it's just a hashtag) turn out to be shitty or have done shitty things and the whole community falls apart instead of not letting the shitty people continue to claim ownership of a grassroots community that never truly had anyone "in charge" anywayIt's absurd
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    @justine @crisl_at Yes, I do. I've tested both SeaweedFS and Garage for the Mastodon media files - while migrating from Minio, I saw that Garage started to be extremely slow and use all my cpus after more or less 60 GB. SeaweedFS is much more tailored to this use case and it's fast and extremely light on CPU and other resources.The people developing Garage suggested me to re-test with a recent release as there have been some improvements but I haven't performed those tests, yet.At the moment, I'm happy with SeaweedFS and I'm using it both for the BSD Cafe and illumos Cafe instances.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    0 Views
    @ProcessParsnip Oh. Has he been listening to fascist theory? Denouncing these safeguards is a common feature in fascist tirades, because it offers ample opportunities of dramatic performances about a "big man of the people fighting the nefarious red tape / fraud, waste and abuse" and such nonsense — and oftentimes, the specific tyrannical things that they want to do when breaking the safeguard are, indeed, popular among their constituents, allowing them to enfirmen support from these constituents.And, as for specifity, no modern mainstream political thinker adocates against such safeguards in general; there's only debate over which safeguards would be the most preferable. The closest, perhaps weirdly — but as you point out, some of the theory gets silly fast — are the Libertarians and the Objectivists, when arguing against a special case: the safeguards against antisocial hoarding and dispensation of private property, which both sometimes do clad in quasi-electoral arguments (or, well, real electoral quasi-arguments in the context of corporate governance), but both are on the fringes of the ancap/fasc spectrum to begin with.