What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
Uncategorized
22
Posts
11
Posters
74
Views
-
@afreytes Amiga Topaz 11 (NOT Topaz 8, that's ugly). Use with square pixel aspect ratio.
Second favorite is C64 ROM font, with NTSC pixel aspect ratio (7:9 tall pixels).
@isaackuo I still sometimes configure whatever terminal to have the C64 font and the blue on blue colorway.
I will have to try the Amiga font, which I'm almost sure I have never actually used.
-
-
@ralfmaximus It looks like there is: https://github.com/ashjoubert/HackSlash
-
@ralfmaximus It looks like there is: https://github.com/ashjoubert/HackSlash
Oh that is lovely! Thank you.
-
What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
I would like to try it! (if I have never used it...)
@afreytes Monaspace! It’s very clever, its monospaced but uses OpenType to set glyph widths so that the overall tone of type looks even. I use it as the text face on my blog.
-
What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
I would like to try it! (if I have never used it...)
@afreytes Code Page 437
-
What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
I would like to try it! (if I have never used it...)
@afreytes
Julia!Julia Mono https://juliamono.netlify.app/
-
@afreytes
Julia!Julia Mono https://juliamono.netlify.app/
@cordelya oh, looks neat, and I've never used it before.
Will definitely try it. Thanks!
-
What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
I would like to try it! (if I have never used it...)
Thanks everyone for the recommendations!
Except for the Amiga.Topaz.11, I have all of these in my download folder as we speak, and I will be trying them out in the following weeks.
Thanks again, much obliged.
-
What is your absolute favorite monospaced font?
I would like to try it! (if I have never used it...)
@afreytes Comic Mono. I actually like Comic Sans due in part to fond childhood associations with The Sims, on top of that one Vsauce video, though Comic Mono is definitely noticeably removed from Sans.
-
@afreytes Comic Mono. I actually like Comic Sans due in part to fond childhood associations with The Sims, on top of that one Vsauce video, though Comic Mono is definitely noticeably removed from Sans.
@lepidotos I don't hate Comic Sans... or Papyrus!
I feel like both have been bullied, and are perhaps victims of their own success, so to speak.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Chi esercita il DIRITTO di voto ha il DOVERE di informarsi.
#referendum #ReferendumGiustizia
-
@levelbot I feel good about myself and this number.
-
buckle up <-> buckle down axis
-
@reiver@mastodon.social knowing people in general... They will get more bug reports if they said "whom"
-
@reiver I've heard John Mastodon personally picks those out of a tall hat, for each user, individually. What a great man.
-
I'm writing this in English.
Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.
This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.
@Gargron@mastodon.social argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.
For many of us, translation is first about access.
The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.
@Gargron@mastodon.social notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.
There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.
I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @Gargron@mastodon.social describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.
The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.
-
I've been checking out @inkwell , the new journaling app on the Fediverse. It looks absolutely great. Fantastic work by @stanton. If you'd like to follow me there, check out @evan@inkwell.social.
-
There is the complete list that Mastodon is suggesting I (potentially) follow.
