It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform.
-
It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform. Instead she'd prefer to proudly talk to investors about how even J.D. Vance has an account.
It's the digital town square! Everyone is empowered to moderate their own feed, except if you say mean things about Charlie Kirk.
It that doesn't make you want to build over here instead, I don't know what will.
-
It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform. Instead she'd prefer to proudly talk to investors about how even J.D. Vance has an account.
It's the digital town square! Everyone is empowered to moderate their own feed, except if you say mean things about Charlie Kirk.
It that doesn't make you want to build over here instead, I don't know what will.
In the end, Bluesky serves as another example for decentralization as a technological fetish. It is meaningless babble: neither decentralized in practice, nor offering the kinds of protections the rhetoric promises.
A social network worthy of its name must be grounded in community norms and practices that are negotiated _by_ the community. Anyone who buys into "protocols over platforms" without community governance at its core has been sold a bill of goods.
-
It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform. Instead she'd prefer to proudly talk to investors about how even J.D. Vance has an account.
It's the digital town square! Everyone is empowered to moderate their own feed, except if you say mean things about Charlie Kirk.
It that doesn't make you want to build over here instead, I don't know what will.
@eloquence Removed myself. Going on an extended “poster strike”, just like dear Jay suggested.
-
It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform. Instead she'd prefer to proudly talk to investors about how even J.D. Vance has an account.
It's the digital town square! Everyone is empowered to moderate their own feed, except if you say mean things about Charlie Kirk.
It that doesn't make you want to build over here instead, I don't know what will.
@eloquence who could have POSSIBLY seen this coming? I mean, except anyone who has ever looked at any history of any tech company, ever?
-
undefined Oblomov ha condiviso questa discussione
-
It's pretty clear from the #Bluesky CEO's shitposting that she really would rather not have all those uppity trans folks and their friends on the platform. Instead she'd prefer to proudly talk to investors about how even J.D. Vance has an account.
It's the digital town square! Everyone is empowered to moderate their own feed, except if you say mean things about Charlie Kirk.
It that doesn't make you want to build over here instead, I don't know what will.
@eloquence I can understand people that don't want to build here on the Fediverse because of technical limitations of the protocol. But if *that*'s really the reason, and not an excuse for the social reasons, why not build over other open protocols with the same features as AT, but not controlled by Nazi-friendly cryptogrifters, like SSB or even something that is AP-compatible like the stuff developed by Mike MacGirvin?
(Yeah, I know the answer.)