Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per Note or Article implementing quoteUrl or the likes
-
Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per
NoteorArticleimplementingquoteUrlor the likes?
CC: @silverpill -
Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per
NoteorArticleimplementingquoteUrlor the likes?
CC: @silverpill@mario Mitra supports multiple quotes. For every quote, a FEP-e232 tag is added, but there is always only one
quoteUrl(this comment will have two quotes)
https://mastodon.social/users/Edent/statuses/115310022243443794
https://iosdev.space/users/tootsdk/statuses/115310093224755863
-
@mario Mitra supports multiple quotes. For every quote, a FEP-e232 tag is added, but there is always only one
quoteUrl(this comment will have two quotes)
https://mastodon.social/users/Edent/statuses/115310022243443794
https://iosdev.space/users/tootsdk/statuses/115310093224755863
@silverpill is there a specific reason not to use an array of URLs forquoteUrl? -
@silverpill is there a specific reason not to use an array of URLs for
quoteUrl?@mario I suspect that no software would understand that.
-
@mario I suspect that no software would understand that.
Just did a quick test: mastodon will pick the first, pleroma will choke if receiving an array of URLs.
@silverpill @Phantasm @Helge -
Just did a quick test: mastodon will pick the first, pleroma will choke if receiving an array of URLs.
@silverpill @Phantasm @Helge@mario Mitra will also choke on an array of URLs. I think the value of this property is supposed to be a string.
(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in
tagorto) -
@mario Mitra will also choke on an array of URLs. I think the value of this property is supposed to be a string.
(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in
tagorto)@silverpill(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in tag or to)
This is some sort of edge case. They are not among my connections and i had to manually approve their comments.
It is probably correct to not include them intosince this is a contained conversation and it is not allowed to change the audience scope. Not sure abouttag. But if they are not supposed to get the message... Anyway, this restrictions probably do not make sense for public posts