so #bluesky is struggling with spam?
General Discussion
1
Posts
1
Posters
14
Views
-
so #bluesky is struggling with spam? we could've told you that dealing with that junk at scale won't work. that we have a much higher proportion of admins per user for a reason. but you chose to build your own. you're still not decentralized. but you obviously always cared more about making it profitable than sustainable.
we are not the same. #ATproto #ActivityPub
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@by_caballero thanks, I’ll have a look!
-
@django https://codeberg.org/socialweb.coop/activitypub-testing this could easily be forked as a starting point
-
@mleduc @saerdnaer @xwikiorg it was amazing when it was alive! Now there is https://ibis.wiki for federated wiki software currently
-
@django They are currently no ActivityPub C2S tests in FediTest. No reason why they could not be added, though, other than the time it takes.
Also, see https://feditest.org/contrib/results/
-
@saerdnaer @liaizon at @xwikiorg we did an activitypub extension https://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ActivityPub%20Application/ for #xwiki, sadly it is not working anymore with other actors of the fediverse and we don't have the bandwidth to revive the extension. But it proved that it was technically possible.
-
-
Random #fosdem notes. Met a nice dev from @ente #ente with whom I discussed a subtle bug on GitHub a few weeks ago (thanks for the now released fix!). Also met @liaizon. Thanks for reaching out; it's always cool to discuss the integration #activitypub in wikis!
-
@j12t digging around l see that there are some some tests relating to client/server relationship
This is all I could find though, is there any documentation of which tests are performed? Or does it follow what the original test suite did?
https://github.com/jernst/annost/tree/08ee6fbe1798bd94883c9cbecbd27fc502409a97
