đ From the Verge's interview with Connor Hayes, the head of Threads:
-
đ From the Verge's interview with Connor Hayes, the head of Threads:
Threads still supports federation with other apps like Mastodon, but Hayes was clear that itâs not a top priority for the current roadmap. âItâs something that weâre supporting, itâs something that weâre maintaining, but itâs not the thing that weâre talking about thatâs gonna help the app break out,â he said.
âAs someone who has built a zillion consumer products, itâs just really hard to keep these divergent platforms and products consistent on the same protocol over time,â he explained. âThereâs always going to be the trade-offs that these companies are thinking about of how much energy do I want to pour into compatibility with this ecosystem versus iterating on this thing Iâm building and seeing whatâs valuable.â
So wow, it's almost like Mark F---ing Zuckerberg was LYING when he talked about the importance of decentralization when Threads launched! Who, who could have predicted?
Although of course, they're Meta, they could well be lying again. So let's not get complacent here. Still, it's a good opportunity to take a moment to laugh at all the fediverse influencers who pointed to Threads adoption of ActivityPub as a huge victory for our cause -- and a key ingredient to fedi's success going forward. How'd that work out?
And let's also give credit where credit is due: @FediPact and everybody else who pushed back so strongly against Threads and made it clear that so many of us really don't want them here. They've got infinite resources, and If they were seeing value from the integration, they'd continue to push it. It sounds like they're not, at least for now. Good news!!!!
-
đ From the Verge's interview with Connor Hayes, the head of Threads:
Threads still supports federation with other apps like Mastodon, but Hayes was clear that itâs not a top priority for the current roadmap. âItâs something that weâre supporting, itâs something that weâre maintaining, but itâs not the thing that weâre talking about thatâs gonna help the app break out,â he said.
âAs someone who has built a zillion consumer products, itâs just really hard to keep these divergent platforms and products consistent on the same protocol over time,â he explained. âThereâs always going to be the trade-offs that these companies are thinking about of how much energy do I want to pour into compatibility with this ecosystem versus iterating on this thing Iâm building and seeing whatâs valuable.â
So wow, it's almost like Mark F---ing Zuckerberg was LYING when he talked about the importance of decentralization when Threads launched! Who, who could have predicted?
Although of course, they're Meta, they could well be lying again. So let's not get complacent here. Still, it's a good opportunity to take a moment to laugh at all the fediverse influencers who pointed to Threads adoption of ActivityPub as a huge victory for our cause -- and a key ingredient to fedi's success going forward. How'd that work out?
And let's also give credit where credit is due: @FediPact and everybody else who pushed back so strongly against Threads and made it clear that so many of us really don't want them here. They've got infinite resources, and If they were seeing value from the integration, they'd continue to push it. It sounds like they're not, at least for now. Good news!!!!
They have not yet figured out how to exploit Threads into the thin wedge that controls - and monetizes - the fedi. So, they're going to not work too hard on keeping Threads going, but they are still looking for that inroad.
Maintain paranoia proximity alerts at all times.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on