how is reentry in the US looking for trans people after last week’s events?
Uncategorized
5
Posts
4
Posters
26
Views
-
how is reentry in the US looking for trans people after last week’s events? debating cancelling my trip to austria for safety reasons…
-
how is reentry in the US looking for trans people after last week’s events? debating cancelling my trip to austria for safety reasons…
until now, my assumption has been that as a highly recognized open source developer, founder and activist, that too many people would have questions if i went missing, but at this point is that an effective enough deterrent…
-
until now, my assumption has been that as a highly recognized open source developer, founder and activist, that too many people would have questions if i went missing, but at this point is that an effective enough deterrent…
@ariadne ah, wow, we never felt safe making any such assumption. we've been avoiding entering the US for over a year now.
-
until now, my assumption has been that as a highly recognized open source developer, founder and activist, that too many people would have questions if i went missing, but at this point is that an effective enough deterrent…
@ariadne I'd suggest routing to an airport with preclearance if possible, but given the unknowns I'd suggest cancelling your trips out of the US.
-
@ariadne ah, wow, we never felt safe making any such assumption. we've been avoiding entering the US for over a year now.
@ireneista @ariadne Yeah I’m pretty sure the assholes “in charge” right now don’t care who they disappear or who knows about it :(
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
We're going to need more Luigis.
-
@nuclearpasta it is, but in the longer term it's truly beneficial
-
@soph Interesting: do you have a citation for vibe-code failing legal checks? No issue if you don't, I can hop on Google and find it, but this would be the first I'd heard of it (most of what I've heard is that LLM output is uncopyrightable, not that it violates someone else's copyright).
The reason I ask is that I'm aware of corporate contexts where it's being used and if the courts are leaning towards declaring them copyright violations that could have significant implications (declaring them non-copyrightable probably less so; in practice most companies protect source code as trade-secret because it's hard to prove provenance in a court-of-law... Or by moving so fast that a competitor exfiltrating an out-of-date chunk of source isn't super useful or would require the competitor to also have the hardware / architecture the code "lives" in).
-
I'd contest that this is not clear, either. If it can be shown that something an LLM created has clear lineage back to a copyrighted work, then we have a clear breach of the original license.
This needs to be the case to support the original license and the spirit of that license. Tools that are just doing a glorified copy/paste are violating those original licenses.
-
@HailsandAles lol
-
-
Sorry, I guess I don't quite understand how you're making this distinction? If gcc produces a bug, I don't actually know how to fix gcc to make it stop producing that bug? Or is that not what you meant?
Or are you trying to say that one category of tools is deterministic and the other is not? Because that's true; but arguably also kind of the point.
-
Chronic Illness Humor (@chronicillness.bsky.social)
https://bsky.app/profile/chronicillness.bsky.social/post/3mgssks2mfk2c
> Artist: @jennscomics
