Neurodivergent devs: what languages actually *click* for your brain?
Uncategorized
42
Posts
14
Posters
0
Views
-
It's like you're walking through an abandoned mall and discover a custom rolls Royce parked with the keys in the ignition fully fueled. And you can just... Drive it.
It's got a lot of quirks but underneath it all is a solid foundation that has so many good ideas in
@catboi29 You've sold me on the imagery alone. What does Common Lisp actually *feel* like to use day-to-day? Is the quirkiness charming or frustrating?
-
@d1 Bash is honest about what it is — no pretenses. Do you ever find yourself wanting something higher-level, or does Bash cover most of what you need?
@dylanisaiah I also really like #python and C. Languages like Javascript, C++ etc are unthinkable to me, I see them as unholy abominations.
-
@dylanisaiah I also really like #python and C. Languages like Javascript, C++ etc are unthinkable to me, I see them as unholy abominations.
@d1 Python doesn't click with me and C looks scary! I don't even want to touch JS or C++ honestly
-
Neurodivergent devs: what languages actually *click* for your brain? Not popularity — what feels kind, predictable, low-cognitive-load? Why?
I'm building a framework for ND devs and want real experiences. Rust? Go? Odin? Python? Something else?
Tell me what works (or doesn't) for you.
#ActuallyAutistic #ADHD #Neurodivergent #Programming #Rust #Go #Odin
@dylanisaiah Python is generally my go-to but I'm fairly used to jumping between languages.
Python's pretty nice because it reads like pseudocode and still has a LOT of uses, so it's both super accessible and super powerful
-
@dylanisaiah Python is generally my go-to but I'm fairly used to jumping between languages.
Python's pretty nice because it reads like pseudocode and still has a LOT of uses, so it's both super accessible and super powerful
@sitcom_nemesis I haven't been able to click with Python. I've been jumping languages like I distro-hop for ~10 years. I keep coming back to Rust but learning is a significant struggle for me. So I'm trying to find something that works better with my brain
-
Neurodivergent devs: what languages actually *click* for your brain? Not popularity — what feels kind, predictable, low-cognitive-load? Why?
I'm building a framework for ND devs and want real experiences. Rust? Go? Odin? Python? Something else?
Tell me what works (or doesn't) for you.
#ActuallyAutistic #ADHD #Neurodivergent #Programming #Rust #Go #Odin
@dylanisaiah in my personal experience, the challenge is to reduce the working memory demand, which materialize in two main ways:
- having to track side effects due to global state, autowiring, meta-programmaing or monkey-patching: Ruby, JS and Python are the worst offenders in descending order
- having inconsistently documented inputs and outputs for functions. I hate languages such as JS or Java where one function can have a dozen overrides. I love languages such as Go, Rust, Gleam, where there's a consistent documentation format and a single website to read them all, instead of having to navigate to each project's website to find where the docs are (if there are any)
Although it can be tedious and not fun to write, Go spoils me on both aspects so that's the language I usually default to:
- using global state is frowned upon, magic tricks too. My IDE's "go to definition" / "go to usage" functions are enough to navigate the code base, no need to grep and pray. Formatting and software patterns are consistent across projects, so diving into a library is pretty fast
- https://pkg.go.dev offers a consistent experience to navigate both the stdlib docs and dependencies docs. My IDE shows the apidoc on mouseover, with a link to pkg.go.dev to navigate it easily
The Rust ecosystem's over-reliance on macros breaks point one for me (and makes compile times horrible!). "Go to definition" is my most used keyboard shortcut because I like to read my dependencies' code, and many Rust libraries break that flow (with macros in the middle of the flow, or too many abstraction levels)
Gleam's functional + immutable with a familiar syntax should theoretically work great for me, but the ecosystem is a bit too young for now. But I'm keeping a close eye on it.
-
@d1 Python doesn't click with me and C looks scary! I don't even want to touch JS or C++ honestly
@dylanisaiah There's a learning curve with C (best if one has some sort of mentor), but it's great once once gets the hang of it. It's very Old School.
-
@d1 Bash is honest about what it is — no pretenses. Do you ever find yourself wanting something higher-level, or does Bash cover most of what you need?
@dylanisaiah As to something higher level (*and* performant, unlike python): if I ever get really ambitious, I think I might try some #Zig.
-
@dylanisaiah As to something higher level (*and* performant, unlike python): if I ever get really ambitious, I think I might try some #Zig.
@d1 Zig looks super interesting to me honestly. I was looking at it and Odin at the same time.
-
@dylanisaiah in my personal experience, the challenge is to reduce the working memory demand, which materialize in two main ways:
- having to track side effects due to global state, autowiring, meta-programmaing or monkey-patching: Ruby, JS and Python are the worst offenders in descending order
- having inconsistently documented inputs and outputs for functions. I hate languages such as JS or Java where one function can have a dozen overrides. I love languages such as Go, Rust, Gleam, where there's a consistent documentation format and a single website to read them all, instead of having to navigate to each project's website to find where the docs are (if there are any)
Although it can be tedious and not fun to write, Go spoils me on both aspects so that's the language I usually default to:
- using global state is frowned upon, magic tricks too. My IDE's "go to definition" / "go to usage" functions are enough to navigate the code base, no need to grep and pray. Formatting and software patterns are consistent across projects, so diving into a library is pretty fast
- https://pkg.go.dev offers a consistent experience to navigate both the stdlib docs and dependencies docs. My IDE shows the apidoc on mouseover, with a link to pkg.go.dev to navigate it easily
The Rust ecosystem's over-reliance on macros breaks point one for me (and makes compile times horrible!). "Go to definition" is my most used keyboard shortcut because I like to read my dependencies' code, and many Rust libraries break that flow (with macros in the middle of the flow, or too many abstraction levels)
Gleam's functional + immutable with a familiar syntax should theoretically work great for me, but the ecosystem is a bit too young for now. But I'm keeping a close eye on it.
@quinze This is incredibly helpful — thank you.
"Working memory demand" is exactly the framing I needed. Your Go vs Rust macros/"go to definition" point really resonates.
This reinforces what I'm building with Axis — predictable, discoverable, low-magic.
Given Go's philosophy works for you, do you ever miss features, or is the simplicity itself the win?
Really appreciate you writing this out.
-
Neurodivergent devs: what languages actually *click* for your brain? Not popularity — what feels kind, predictable, low-cognitive-load? Why?
I'm building a framework for ND devs and want real experiences. Rust? Go? Odin? Python? Something else?
Tell me what works (or doesn't) for you.
#ActuallyAutistic #ADHD #Neurodivergent #Programming #Rust #Go #Odin
@dylanisaiah #ActauallyAutistic person here who's written software both for fun and for money for some time now.
The ones I've used the most over the past few years are Python and Go.
Python: it's probably the language I've leveled up in -- and *can* level up in -- most quickly. I can generally write up a quick script-level application in Python almost as fast as I can think about it intelligently. There are plenty of other languages and frameworks that are faster and/or a bit easier to do really complex or low-level tasks in, but for anything that's at the level of most small tasks that don't need to run fast, it's where I usually look first.
Go: it's ugly. I won't deny it. But its core functionality is pretty simple to pick up as well (it feels *kind of* like basic C with a bit of Python and most of the C footguns disabled or even removed), and in general it's pretty easy to tell what a given bit of code in Go is trying to accomplish. That's important when you're coming back to an old project after a few months and need to reboot some working memory. It also ranks pretty highly on application execution speed, much of the toolchain (compiles crazy fast and gives you a single executable file in general), and a few other things like that. I can generally focus on actually writing what needs to be written. It's what I've tended to use recently when Python is too slow (which it often is).
I like the *idea* behind Rust, and it'd seems like it could be a good choice for a good-sized project that didn't feel right for either Python or Go, but I don't know it anywhere near as well as those two.
I'm not super fond of JavaScript and friends (I stopped doing web dev after a while for that reason), and I haven't worked with most others regularly in the last 5 years or so, so I can't comment about much else.
-
@catboi29 You've sold me on the imagery alone. What does Common Lisp actually *feel* like to use day-to-day? Is the quirkiness charming or frustrating?
@dylanisaiah difficult to enumerate. Some bits feel very old (like the "car" function named after a register on an old IBM mainframe from the 70s) and some of it is space age: getting into macros and writing programs that write programs.
It's a language that you will be learning new things about for years and years.
A good place to start is googling "practical common lisp" as a free introductory book.
It is, unfortunately, completely unemployable!
-
@quinze This is incredibly helpful — thank you.
"Working memory demand" is exactly the framing I needed. Your Go vs Rust macros/"go to definition" point really resonates.
This reinforces what I'm building with Axis — predictable, discoverable, low-magic.
Given Go's philosophy works for you, do you ever miss features, or is the simplicity itself the win?
Really appreciate you writing this out.
@dylanisaiah when writing Go, the two things I miss most are:
- sum types + pattern matching -> really reduces code complexity
- Result / Option instead of nullable -> mostly cosmetic, although nil pointer exceptions are not fun to get into
Iterators & generics are good enough,
samber/loscratches my map-reduce itch when it makes the code easier to maintain than a loop. -
@dylanisaiah when writing Go, the two things I miss most are:
- sum types + pattern matching -> really reduces code complexity
- Result / Option instead of nullable -> mostly cosmetic, although nil pointer exceptions are not fun to get into
Iterators & generics are good enough,
samber/loscratches my map-reduce itch when it makes the code easier to maintain than a loop.@dylanisaiah ah, and quick build times are a must for my ADHD. In Kotlin, my brain is already drifting elsewhere before the unit tests execute.
-
@josejfernandez @gooba42 IDE weight mostly — Visual Studio/Rider feel heavy compared to lightweight editors I use for other languages. Do you use something lighter? Or does the tooling just fade into the background after a while?
@dylanisaiah @josejfernandez My experience is that for a while you ignore the IDE but as you get used to it, it's more like having someone over your shoulder who's actually helpful.
Syntax highlighting, Intellisense, help formatting... None of it is critical but it's all helpful enough to want to keep it.
-
@dylanisaiah @josejfernandez My experience is that for a while you ignore the IDE but as you get used to it, it's more like having someone over your shoulder who's actually helpful.
Syntax highlighting, Intellisense, help formatting... None of it is critical but it's all helpful enough to want to keep it.
@gooba42 @josejfernandez I really want to use an IDE, I just simply can't pick one. IntelliJ, Visual Studio. They feel "bloated" to me.
-
@dylanisaiah #ActauallyAutistic person here who's written software both for fun and for money for some time now.
The ones I've used the most over the past few years are Python and Go.
Python: it's probably the language I've leveled up in -- and *can* level up in -- most quickly. I can generally write up a quick script-level application in Python almost as fast as I can think about it intelligently. There are plenty of other languages and frameworks that are faster and/or a bit easier to do really complex or low-level tasks in, but for anything that's at the level of most small tasks that don't need to run fast, it's where I usually look first.
Go: it's ugly. I won't deny it. But its core functionality is pretty simple to pick up as well (it feels *kind of* like basic C with a bit of Python and most of the C footguns disabled or even removed), and in general it's pretty easy to tell what a given bit of code in Go is trying to accomplish. That's important when you're coming back to an old project after a few months and need to reboot some working memory. It also ranks pretty highly on application execution speed, much of the toolchain (compiles crazy fast and gives you a single executable file in general), and a few other things like that. I can generally focus on actually writing what needs to be written. It's what I've tended to use recently when Python is too slow (which it often is).
I like the *idea* behind Rust, and it'd seems like it could be a good choice for a good-sized project that didn't feel right for either Python or Go, but I don't know it anywhere near as well as those two.
I'm not super fond of JavaScript and friends (I stopped doing web dev after a while for that reason), and I haven't worked with most others regularly in the last 5 years or so, so I can't comment about much else.
@hatysa This is exactly the kind of real-world experience I needed. Thank you.
"Reboot working memory" after months away — that's the goal. That's what I'm trying to build with Axis.
Right now I'm still exploring — Odin, Rust, Zig, and even Java are in the mix. Hearing how Go works for you is really helpful context.
Appreciate you taking the time!
-
@dylanisaiah when writing Go, the two things I miss most are:
- sum types + pattern matching -> really reduces code complexity
- Result / Option instead of nullable -> mostly cosmetic, although nil pointer exceptions are not fun to get into
Iterators & generics are good enough,
samber/loscratches my map-reduce itch when it makes the code easier to maintain than a loop.@quinze This is exactly the kind of detail I'm looking for — thank you.
Sum types + pattern matching feel like a superpower. And yeah, nil pointer exceptions are rough.
Good to know samber/lo helps — I'll check it out.
-
@dylanisaiah ah, and quick build times are a must for my ADHD. In Kotlin, my brain is already drifting elsewhere before the unit tests execute.
@quinze "Brain already drifting elsewhere before unit tests execute" — this hit hard. Build speed is absolutely part of "kindness" for me too.
Slow feedback loops kill focus.
-
@gooba42 @josejfernandez I really want to use an IDE, I just simply can't pick one. IntelliJ, Visual Studio. They feel "bloated" to me.
@dylanisaiah @josejfernandez No doubt they are heavier than just an editor but you do get something in the trade.
I'd suggest just try one for a while. Stick with it through at least one project, not super trivial but it doesn't have to be huge either.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
In my humble opinion, hosting instant messaging is something completely different than ActivityPub - due to the instant aspect of it.
With this, availability is a far more important aspect of it all. Hence the high available setup. Ofcourse, backups are just as important, but it shouldn't cause a full service outage in the unlikely event that one datacenter has a blackout.
You have given me your trust - and I want to do just by all of you. No matter whether you are messaging a family member about dinner or blowing the whistle about injustice.
At the moment in the upcoming two weeks when Exquisite.chat will be taking signups, I will be vocal about it. Thank you all - Exquisite has been such an awesome experience from the very start. And continues to be just that.
-
Dorsey is a goddamn parasite
-
-
@josh three years sounds reasonable especially if it's a no-brand. Are the batteries replaceable in your UPS?
-
@bbfnart I have sporadically seen this kind of stuff, usually starting by this or that artist out of personal initiative, and I agree that it's an incredible way of discovering new artists (heck, I remember this even from the old webcomic days when everyone had their own website and this was one of the primary ways in which artists helped each other gain visibility). I guess that here the only way to get something like this started is to do the legwork? Hopefully your call gets heard!
-
Announcing Exquisite.chat
Within the upcoming two weeks, Exquisite.chat will officially be launched. The first iteration will be an XMPP server - in a later phase more services will be added.
It does have a few twists:
Uses a hardened setup, powered by both OpenBSD and HardenedBSD. We have our own STUN/TURN setup so you can talk / video with your beloved ones.No logs, full encryption to benefit your (and our) privacy. It is setup in 'high availability' mode. Served from two different datacenters in the Netherlands (our main datacenter, DC1 in Amsterdam, but now adding Rotterdam to the mix) for increased resiliency. So, no clouds (oh hai us-east-1).And some more details that will follow shortly
(1/2)
-
Might happen less frequently here but I still see people doing some over on the #
It would make me feel fuzzy inside if we could see more art community challenge on here
