#Birds #Iowa #Robin
Uncategorized
5
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
#MarshMadness. I got about a 150% view of this robin.
-
#MarshMadness. I got about a 150% view of this robin.
@donray I guess spring is coming!
-
@donray I guess spring is coming!
For sure. The robins are coming to the yard now, no doubt scoping out nesting territories.
They are also at the pond in bunches, since there isn't much water anywhere else nearby (except in my yard).
-
#MarshMadness. I got about a 150% view of this robin.
@donray let's reflect on your math
-
@donray let's reflect on your math
But not too carefully!
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
@kenobit consultati con qualcuno per le kettle, perché così a naso con le mie conoscenze di fisica tenere muscoli e tendini delle braccia in tensione e trazione pressoché continua per 30 minuti può avere effetti indesiderati...
-
I asked claude.ai to write a spreadsheet. exactly like that. this is what it came back with.
-
@oblomov @GustavinoBevilacqua @ALFA Avrei detto meno! Ho trovato anche delle indicazioni di spessori più bassi, può darsi che il numero si possa dimezzare
-
-
@oblomov Having foo be a class and not a struct would make some things a lot more complicated. If there's no other way, I'd probably prefer to generate automatically the procedures that take struct bar *, invoke the converter explicitly, and then call the hand-written procedures, over doing multiple inheritance.
-
@ananas You're thinking about something weird.
I want to do something like this, which, as you can see, is so perfectly cromulent than it compiles and runs:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct bar {
int paydirt;
};
struct foo {
int some_field_here;
struct bar cheap_dirt;
operator bar &() {
return cheap_dirt;
}
};
void work_on_paydirt (struct bar &object) {
printf("Teh paydirt is %i\n", object.paydirt);
}
struct foo the_foo;
struct bar the_bar;
int main () {
work_on_paydirt(the_foo);
work_on_paydirt(the_bar);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}I just want work_on_paydirt, for historic compatibility reasons, to take struct bar * rather than struct bar & as its argument. Logic-wise, maintenance-wise, there's no difference. Even the generated code is exactly the same (modulo the mangled names). But C++ syntax is only happy to let me define an explicit conversion operator for a struct-to-struct-reference, and not for the same struct's pointer to a struct pointer. I'm not trying to do anything exotic here, or type punning or obfuscatory stuff; I just want the translator to implicitly invoke my type converter for a pointer-to-struct type, just like it can for a referenced-struct type.
Post suggeriti
-
-
One of the three Short-eared Owls hunting out at DNRT's Ocean View Farm reserve over the weekend.
Uncategorized
1
-
-
Also from Cape May: a great egret and a snowy egret, a pair of mute swans, six ospreys (I didn't know that they flocked!), and four great black-backed gulls, two adults flanking two younger birds (a family?).#birds #wildlifePhotography #birdsforbecsnan
Uncategorized
4
