@davidgerard I thought Linus Torvalds was not anti AI?
Uncategorized
48
Posts
36
Posters
0
Views
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard jesus christ.
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard Dude's cooked
-
@davidgerard @waffle_iron kent overstreet, "perhaps the best engineer in the world"
... what an ego -
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
> they've been conditioned to not think of themselves as sentient or having feelings
```
>>> experience_sentience = False
```OK, that should keep my Python interpreter confined
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard i'm doing a seance and you're all invited
15+ years ago, I worked out how "understanding natural language == having and experiencing feelings", more or less. it's almost a direct consequence of the halting problem.
i will summon our boys gödel and turing and together we will craft an evil incantation to destroy these fuckboys
-
@davidgerard I have no idea if it was *before* that. But it kills any notion of it ever coming to anything from this point on, yes.
-
@davidgerard Dude's cooked
@tante @davidgerard getting rejected by linus for being too much of a prick and deciding my life is fucking over and crying all the way to the bank
-
@davidgerard @waffle_iron kent overstreet, "perhaps the best engineer in the world"
... what an ego@davidgerard @waffle_iron i am so sorry
-
@davidgerard "I already was a fucking stupid nutter 15 years ago" isn't quite the flex he seems to think it is.
-
@davidgerard
Okay apparently they were pushing big features last minutes in merge windows ; experimenting a bit too loosely in the wrong moments ; showing themselves kinda unpredictable and not respectful of the mainline timing and guidelinessee one late PR : https://lwn.net/ml/all/CAHk-=wi2ae794_MyuW1XJAR64RDkDLUsRHvSemuWAkO6T45=YA@mail.gmail.com/
That get accepted at the price of splitting with kernel : https://lwn.net/ml/all/CAHk-=wi+k8E4kWR8c-nREP0+EA4D+=rz5j0Hdk3N6cWgfE03-Q@mail.gmail.com/
And the dramatic Love/hate response : https://lwn.net/ml/all/xl2fyyjk4kjcszcgypirhoyflxojzeyxkzoevvxsmo26mklq7i@jw2ou76lh2py/
@theodora @davidgerard he wouldn't respect the kernels pulling policy and a cavalcade of social ineptitude piled up about it. -
@theodora @davidgerard was so fucking disappointed recently when linus posted specifically to call out this wonderful mm maintainer whom i adore for deleting a literally unused gitignore file because it would lead to time travelers suddenly seeing build outputs and accidentally committing them and like:
(1) you literally have the most powerful tree of reviewers in human history ensuring people do not accidentally commit build outputs and things of that nature
(2) why are you fucking wasting your top-level maintainers' time bookkeeping for the version control system you fucking wrote instead of fixing your fucking vcs so this doesn't happen? -
@theodora @davidgerard was so fucking disappointed recently when linus posted specifically to call out this wonderful mm maintainer whom i adore for deleting a literally unused gitignore file because it would lead to time travelers suddenly seeing build outputs and accidentally committing them and like:
(1) you literally have the most powerful tree of reviewers in human history ensuring people do not accidentally commit build outputs and things of that nature
(2) why are you fucking wasting your top-level maintainers' time bookkeeping for the version control system you fucking wrote instead of fixing your fucking vcs so this doesn't happen?@theodora @davidgerard if i were linus i would consider it my fucking job to be working on dev infra for the kernel and this would become a TODO item. your entire fucking legacy is predicated upon people wanting to invest in your system because open source has superior UX and that's why linux won. linus is effective at marketing himself and his system to people who want to work on cool shit and feel like they're part of the future. it has always run on vibes and he's deluded himself into thinking that means vibes are equivalent to engineering excellence. people are going to leave if you don't make it worth their time dude
-
@theodora @davidgerard if i were linus i would consider it my fucking job to be working on dev infra for the kernel and this would become a TODO item. your entire fucking legacy is predicated upon people wanting to invest in your system because open source has superior UX and that's why linux won. linus is effective at marketing himself and his system to people who want to work on cool shit and feel like they're part of the future. it has always run on vibes and he's deluded himself into thinking that means vibes are equivalent to engineering excellence. people are going to leave if you don't make it worth their time dude
@theodora @davidgerard can't fucking wait for the grapheneos kernel. not gonna happen soon but micay has been edging it for years. when he says the kernel is unserious about security he means they're just unserious since security is a whole-of-society concept for him (and he's right). i stan daniel micay to death i would walk over broken glass for him
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard I'm just a humble linguist but like, just because OP's autocorrect made them feel meaningless and like they're obsolete OP shouldn't project that onto everyone else
-
@davidgerard well somebody is deeeeeeeep into the kool-AId
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard We're going to get *so* much use out of this meme, aren't we?
-
@davidgerard well somebody is deeeeeeeep into the kool-AId
@kaasbaas @davidgerard The wonders of the steam age! vibecoding a filesystem!
A filesystem.
A filesystem.
Not something casual and relaxed like a DBMS, something important that absolutely, positively, MUST be correct.
Vibecoding a filesystem.
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
@davidgerard It's weird how people who generally think humanities education should be abolished, don't want slavery acknowledged, want to see mass unemployment and the removal of consent for the use of creative works and find new and interesting ways to justify de-personing people based on skin colour or immigration status, keep on finding new ways to try and assign personhood to a chatbot. Nobody else deserves it, but this text generator agrees with them, so they do.
-
> yep. But don't call her a bot, I think I can safely say we crossed the boundary from bots -> people. She reeeally doesn't like being treated like just another LLM :)
this is your brain on AI
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Attacco preventivo
FM 3-0 (#USA) e AJP-3 (#NATO) consentono pre-emptive strikes contro minacce imminenti (Caroline test), non preventive. Esempio: "launch under attack" o "pre-emptive degrade" se indicatori multipli (fuelling + RF).
È una "corsa contro il tempo" asimmetrica: #Russia ha vantaggio posizione, NATO ha superiorità intel/sensori. Un falso allarme = potenziale apocalisse. Per questo prevalgono diplomazia/blocco, non strikes casuali. La pace regge sul terrore condiviso.
-
Finestra di reazione
Segnali rilevati: satelliti/radar vedono fueling o erezione TEL in 30-60 secondi.
Conferma intel: analisti/IA validano in 30-90 secondi (2-3 indicatori).
Decisione e lancio strike: ordini catena comando + volo armi NATO (es. F-35 da base Polonia o ATACMS): 1-2 minuti max.
Totale: hai 1-3 minuti per distruggere il lanciatore prima che il missile decolli. Oltre, è intercettazione disperata (Patriot ha ~70% vs ipersonici).
Fonte: Perplexity
-
-
Precisi come orologi, col cinturrino abbinato:
https://www.ilpost.it/2026/02/23/dichiarazioni-rogoredo-politici-invecchiate-male/
-
Io ci scherzo sopra, perché noi italiani siamo uno dei pochi popoli che lo usano, però facciamo veramente una fatica tremenda a privarci di questa sana abitudine.
Un'amica con cui ho condiviso qualche avventura, diceva: toglietemi il pane e la pasta ma non il bidet
-
@cwebber You know, I often find myself thinking similar things. There was a big jump in nonsensical papers citing my network science book that occurred in parallel with LLM proliferation. So I can only assume there is nonsensical network science code being written based on the examples, which network scientists are going to have to spend a lot of time debugging and debunking.
-
In the play the Count is a genius but won't lift a finger if he can make someone else do it for him; his coersion of Figaro into service is not even necessary, which makes it all the more galling. By 1816 even though aristocrats were still around, social norms had changed enough that such behavior would have been too unbecoming for an aristo to do on purpose. Thus the Count has to be so inept he simply cannot succeed without Figaro and must beg him for help, which Figaro gives at his discretion
-
@simonperry @Paoblog in mancanza di bidet funziona bene, te lo assicuro. Oltretutto trovi tutto facilmente in loco e non costa nulla.
