Good morning Fedi friends!
Uncategorized
29
Posts
12
Posters
110
Views
-
@77nn ah il link non funziona per me (404 error) đ˘â
-
@elena Named after George W. Bush, often referred to as W?
@christopherbrown your comment genuinely made me laugh out loud đâ
-
@77nn ah il link non funziona per me (404 error) đ˘â
Eh, sĂŹ, ho linkato il mio post e si sarĂ aperto sul browser... la mia istanza non serve gli status su web, ma solo attraverso API Mastodon. Qui il link all'articolo:
-
Good morning Fedi friends!
I hope you're having a nice weekend.
I'd like to clear the air re: #WSocial and my opposition to it.
I got a lot of messages on my Mastodon account (several over private DM) trying to dissuade me from speaking up about it and urging me to work on improving the fediverse instead.
I hear you.
But I disagree.
I experienced the same thing last year, when I mentioned I had incendiary evidence about the lack of content moderation on Substack. I had many examples of posts and replies inciting racism, homophobia, fatphobia and xenophobia and spreading dangerous health misinformation. I had taken screenshots and reported them. When I checked back months later, none of my reports had been acted upon. I am talking about seriously heinous messages that are still on there. When I mentioned this on the fediverse, I got many responses urging me "not to waste my time" and "to stay positive" and to "focus instead on helping the fediverse." I did that. Meanwhile Substack is still incredibly popular and most people - even those using it - have no idea of the heinous speech that is allowed on it... and sometimes even monetized. I honestly regret not speaking up. It may not have made a difference, I know (I'm not a megalomaniac) but it makes my skin crawl to think some of the heinous comments are still on there and a young person could come across them and think they are ok. I should have spoken up.
Now, W Social where do I start? Sure, my criticism of it is from a completely different angle. All I want to do is write ONE blog post about its problematic aspects and then I will move on. What is so objectionable about it?
Years ago I wrote a blog post citing all the problems about Dove and its Real Beauty Campaign. It may not have been much, but it was over 10 years ago and the post is still getting hits today. You can see it for yourselves if you look up "The Problem with Dove" and "The Illusionists."
I'm very very lucky to have a little bit of influence on here - I'm immensely grateful for it - and even if I'm preaching to the choir as they say, maybe my advocacy can make a little bit of difference.
My hunch is: staying silent and wishing W Social away is not the way to go. They had a very rushed, botched announcement with no existing product or users. Major security flaws in their setup (I have plenty of evidence). I'd like to write something that you could reference and share... since so far no journalists did any research and simply rehashed the press release of W Social. That's irresponsible reporting â P.R. masked as journalism and it needs to be rectified. That's all I want to do: a blog post about "The Problems with W Social" that hopefully with a sprinkle of SEO magic people can easily find. What's so bad about it? 4 hours of my time and then I'll move on.
Your loyal fedi advocate,
Ele
@elena It wouldn't be the fediverse if we didn't spend time dunking on other social networks, I don't know what those other people were on about đ
-
Good morning Fedi friends!
I hope you're having a nice weekend.
I'd like to clear the air re: #WSocial and my opposition to it.
I got a lot of messages on my Mastodon account (several over private DM) trying to dissuade me from speaking up about it and urging me to work on improving the fediverse instead.
I hear you.
But I disagree.
I experienced the same thing last year, when I mentioned I had incendiary evidence about the lack of content moderation on Substack. I had many examples of posts and replies inciting racism, homophobia, fatphobia and xenophobia and spreading dangerous health misinformation. I had taken screenshots and reported them. When I checked back months later, none of my reports had been acted upon. I am talking about seriously heinous messages that are still on there. When I mentioned this on the fediverse, I got many responses urging me "not to waste my time" and "to stay positive" and to "focus instead on helping the fediverse." I did that. Meanwhile Substack is still incredibly popular and most people - even those using it - have no idea of the heinous speech that is allowed on it... and sometimes even monetized. I honestly regret not speaking up. It may not have made a difference, I know (I'm not a megalomaniac) but it makes my skin crawl to think some of the heinous comments are still on there and a young person could come across them and think they are ok. I should have spoken up.
Now, W Social where do I start? Sure, my criticism of it is from a completely different angle. All I want to do is write ONE blog post about its problematic aspects and then I will move on. What is so objectionable about it?
Years ago I wrote a blog post citing all the problems about Dove and its Real Beauty Campaign. It may not have been much, but it was over 10 years ago and the post is still getting hits today. You can see it for yourselves if you look up "The Problem with Dove" and "The Illusionists."
I'm very very lucky to have a little bit of influence on here - I'm immensely grateful for it - and even if I'm preaching to the choir as they say, maybe my advocacy can make a little bit of difference.
My hunch is: staying silent and wishing W Social away is not the way to go. They had a very rushed, botched announcement with no existing product or users. Major security flaws in their setup (I have plenty of evidence). I'd like to write something that you could reference and share... since so far no journalists did any research and simply rehashed the press release of W Social. That's irresponsible reporting â P.R. masked as journalism and it needs to be rectified. That's all I want to do: a blog post about "The Problems with W Social" that hopefully with a sprinkle of SEO magic people can easily find. What's so bad about it? 4 hours of my time and then I'll move on.
Your loyal fedi advocate,
Ele
@elena I believe that you have more influence than you know. (you certainly have more influence than me.) Go for it. You have good values and good insights. Of all the people I follow (one or two), I have notifications turned on for you, simply because what you say is useful and I want to read it. Post about wsocial.
-
@77nn grazieeee!!! Lo sto leggendo ora, grandissimo đ
ÂŤ In italiano si potrĂ anche dire âVivaâ, come in âVV Verdi!â o in âVV il Duce!â Âť đđ
Dovevo scriverti subito. Bravissimo! Ora continuo a leggereâŚ
-
@77nn grazieeee!!! Lo sto leggendo ora, grandissimo đ
ÂŤ In italiano si potrĂ anche dire âVivaâ, come in âVV Verdi!â o in âVV il Duce!â Âť đđ
Dovevo scriverti subito. Bravissimo! Ora continuo a leggereâŚ
@77nn ok ho appena finito di leggere e wow! Complimenti - è davvero fortissimo quello che hai scritto. Posso citarti nel mio articolo?
-
@elena It wouldn't be the fediverse if we didn't spend time dunking on other social networks, I don't know what those other people were on about đ
@Eliot_L đđ
-
@elena I believe that you have more influence than you know. (you certainly have more influence than me.) Go for it. You have good values and good insights. Of all the people I follow (one or two), I have notifications turned on for you, simply because what you say is useful and I want to read it. Post about wsocial.
@valen1 thank you for the kind words 𼚠and for motivating me to write the piece â
-
@77nn ok ho appena finito di leggere e wow! Complimenti - è davvero fortissimo quello che hai scritto. Posso citarti nel mio articolo?
@elena ma certo! Ne sarei fiero!
-
Good morning Fedi friends!
I hope you're having a nice weekend.
I'd like to clear the air re: #WSocial and my opposition to it.
I got a lot of messages on my Mastodon account (several over private DM) trying to dissuade me from speaking up about it and urging me to work on improving the fediverse instead.
I hear you.
But I disagree.
I experienced the same thing last year, when I mentioned I had incendiary evidence about the lack of content moderation on Substack. I had many examples of posts and replies inciting racism, homophobia, fatphobia and xenophobia and spreading dangerous health misinformation. I had taken screenshots and reported them. When I checked back months later, none of my reports had been acted upon. I am talking about seriously heinous messages that are still on there. When I mentioned this on the fediverse, I got many responses urging me "not to waste my time" and "to stay positive" and to "focus instead on helping the fediverse." I did that. Meanwhile Substack is still incredibly popular and most people - even those using it - have no idea of the heinous speech that is allowed on it... and sometimes even monetized. I honestly regret not speaking up. It may not have made a difference, I know (I'm not a megalomaniac) but it makes my skin crawl to think some of the heinous comments are still on there and a young person could come across them and think they are ok. I should have spoken up.
Now, W Social where do I start? Sure, my criticism of it is from a completely different angle. All I want to do is write ONE blog post about its problematic aspects and then I will move on. What is so objectionable about it?
Years ago I wrote a blog post citing all the problems about Dove and its Real Beauty Campaign. It may not have been much, but it was over 10 years ago and the post is still getting hits today. You can see it for yourselves if you look up "The Problem with Dove" and "The Illusionists."
I'm very very lucky to have a little bit of influence on here - I'm immensely grateful for it - and even if I'm preaching to the choir as they say, maybe my advocacy can make a little bit of difference.
My hunch is: staying silent and wishing W Social away is not the way to go. They had a very rushed, botched announcement with no existing product or users. Major security flaws in their setup (I have plenty of evidence). I'd like to write something that you could reference and share... since so far no journalists did any research and simply rehashed the press release of W Social. That's irresponsible reporting â P.R. masked as journalism and it needs to be rectified. That's all I want to do: a blog post about "The Problems with W Social" that hopefully with a sprinkle of SEO magic people can easily find. What's so bad about it? 4 hours of my time and then I'll move on.
Your loyal fedi advocate,
Ele
@elena I had to Google what wsocial even is, but first impression is definitely not positive. It sounds like Twitter but even more invasive.
I think (hope?) people are generally getting tired of needing to sacrifice more and more freedom and privacy just to share a photo or get a like on a video.
I know I certainly am. In the past year, in addition to selfhosting my blog and Fediverse instance, I've also started using RSS more and joined several message boards. I'm fact, I was a bit surprised how active some forums are, suggesting that I'm not alone in my opinion.
In addition, I'm now serving my blog over i2p and tor, too; it's not that I'm writing anything revolutionary, it's just that I believe people should be able to share their thoughts and ideas without handing over their entire life and identity to any corporate or government entity.
-
@elena I had to Google what wsocial even is, but first impression is definitely not positive. It sounds like Twitter but even more invasive.
I think (hope?) people are generally getting tired of needing to sacrifice more and more freedom and privacy just to share a photo or get a like on a video.
I know I certainly am. In the past year, in addition to selfhosting my blog and Fediverse instance, I've also started using RSS more and joined several message boards. I'm fact, I was a bit surprised how active some forums are, suggesting that I'm not alone in my opinion.
In addition, I'm now serving my blog over i2p and tor, too; it's not that I'm writing anything revolutionary, it's just that I believe people should be able to share their thoughts and ideas without handing over their entire life and identity to any corporate or government entity.
@me This is the way! đâ
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@Paradox Vernacular man's laughter.
-
Tajani:
L'Iran deve pure capire che non è che tutto il mondo è responsabile di quello che accade nel loro paese, l'attacco lo hanno fatto israeliani e americani, non possono pensare che tutti gli altri paesi del golfo devono essere attaccati".
GiĂ ... Tajani... chissĂ perchĂŠ l'Iran sta attaccando paesi lĂŹ vicino che non c'entrano niente quando invece potrebbe bombardare Washington o invadere l'America.
-
@babe Thought this was a grab from Antiques Roadshow at first.
-
Riarmo: lâeuropa compra sempre di piuâ dagli usa. cresce anche lâ esportazione italiana di armi, soprattutto in medio oriente
@anarchia
Sono stati pubblicati dallo Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) nuovi dati sul commercio di armi internazionale che mostrano unâaccelerazione nella corsa agli
-
La guerra âchirurgicaâ contro lâIran che rade al suolo ospedali e scuole
https://www.kulturjam.it/news/la-guerra-chirurgica-contro-liran-che-rade-al-suolo-ospedali-e-scuole/
-
Il confessionalismo a favore della Chiesa cattolica costa circa 6,7 miliardi l'anno. Senza contare 4,8 miliardi stanziati per il giubileo appena concluso. Sostieni il nostro impegno contro i privilegi clericali!
Iscriviti o rinnova la quota per il 2026.đ
https://www.uaar.it/adesione/
-
@aeva not very reassuring đ but I suppose you're right. And of course none of this matters if the game *doesn't* become popular (in which case, and if I could know beforehand, I wouldn't be scratching my head đ )
-
How to Rescue a Wet, Damaged Book: A Handy Visual Primer
https://www.openculture.com/2026/03/how-to-rescue-a-wet-damaged-book-a-handy-visual-primer.html
