**B1
-
**B1
If the Web was "born"
https://mastodon.uno/@stefan@stefanbohacek.online/115537067360048607
it was not "invented"
Se il Web "nacque" non fu "inventato"it was "generated" by a mother [technology] father [user] relationship in an Open System Environment
Fu "generato" da una relazione tra madre [tecnologia] e padre [utente] in un Ambiente Aperto di Sistemawhere "open" did not apply to "source" but to "dialogue"
dove ad essere "aperto" non fu il [codice] "sorgente" [del sistema]
ma il "dialogo" -
**B1
If the Web was "born"
https://mastodon.uno/@stefan@stefanbohacek.online/115537067360048607
it was not "invented"
Se il Web "nacque" non fu "inventato"it was "generated" by a mother [technology] father [user] relationship in an Open System Environment
Fu "generato" da una relazione tra madre [tecnologia] e padre [utente] in un Ambiente Aperto di Sistemawhere "open" did not apply to "source" but to "dialogue"
dove ad essere "aperto" non fu il [codice] "sorgente" [del sistema]
ma il "dialogo"**B2
Italiano in ALTCERN acted as a gatekeeper
between its distributed user community and digital system vendors since the 60iesA digital solution MATERNITY approach [dMa] for the "open system" case could not be taken by Commission and ICT industry
as per https://aei.pitt.edu/63632/a "CERN like" gatekeeper role was out of scope
This case study should be used to understand why the European aim towards an OPEN SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT aborted
-
**B2
Italiano in ALTCERN acted as a gatekeeper
between its distributed user community and digital system vendors since the 60iesA digital solution MATERNITY approach [dMa] for the "open system" case could not be taken by Commission and ICT industry
as per https://aei.pitt.edu/63632/a "CERN like" gatekeeper role was out of scope
This case study should be used to understand why the European aim towards an OPEN SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT aborted
**B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative threadi.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTScan they grant DIGITAL AUTONOMY?
Italian LOCALISATION of this tentative thread [i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION] pending
since the Web was born at CERN -
**B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative threadi.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTScan they grant DIGITAL AUTONOMY?
Italian LOCALISATION of this tentative thread [i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION] pending
since the Web was born at CERN**B4
draft post to be edited recursively, in Italian as well, for unfamiliar concept localisation to be accomplished
based on press release
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717 -
**B4
draft post to be edited recursively, in Italian as well, for unfamiliar concept localisation to be accomplished
based on press release
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717**B5
This "tentative" thread aims to introduce a CIVIL SOCIETY functional requirement
i.e.: enabling itself to take up an institutional roleStatement to be reworded after reading
Duality of the idea of civil society as institutionalized societal sphere and as common world of action
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17448689.2025.2530112#abstract