**B1
-
B1
Se il Web NACQUE non fu INVENTATO
https://mastodon.uno/@stefan@stefanbohacek.online/115537067360048607fu GENERATO da una relazione coniugale ASSISTITA in un Ambiente Aperto di Sistema
dove ad essere APERTO non fu il [codice] "sorgente" [del sistema] ma il "dialogo alla pari"If the Web was "born"
it was not "invented"
it was "generated" by a mother [technology] father [user]
Peer2Peer RELATIONSHIP
in an Open System Environment
where "open" did not apply to "source" but to "dialogue" -
B1
Se il Web NACQUE non fu INVENTATO
https://mastodon.uno/@stefan@stefanbohacek.online/115537067360048607fu GENERATO da una relazione coniugale ASSISTITA in un Ambiente Aperto di Sistema
dove ad essere APERTO non fu il [codice] "sorgente" [del sistema] ma il "dialogo alla pari"If the Web was "born"
it was not "invented"
it was "generated" by a mother [technology] father [user]
Peer2Peer RELATIONSHIP
in an Open System Environment
where "open" did not apply to "source" but to "dialogue"B2
Italiano in ALTCERN acted as a gatekeeper
between its distributed user community and digital system vendors since the 60iesA digital solution "generative" approach for the "open system" case could not be taken by Commission and ICT industry
as per https://aei.pitt.edu/63632/a "CERN like" gatekeeper role was out of scope for standard bodies work plans
This case study should be used to understand why the European aim towards an OPEN SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT aborted
-
B2
Italiano in ALTCERN acted as a gatekeeper
between its distributed user community and digital system vendors since the 60iesA digital solution "generative" approach for the "open system" case could not be taken by Commission and ICT industry
as per https://aei.pitt.edu/63632/a "CERN like" gatekeeper role was out of scope for standard bodies work plans
This case study should be used to understand why the European aim towards an OPEN SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT aborted
B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative threadi.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTSHOW CAN DIGITAL AUTONOMY be granted?
The Italian UNDERSTANDING of this tentative thread
[i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION]
has been pending
since the Web was born at CERN -
B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative threadi.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTSHOW CAN DIGITAL AUTONOMY be granted?
The Italian UNDERSTANDING of this tentative thread
[i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION]
has been pending
since the Web was born at CERNB4
IF
Big Tech
GATEKEEPERS
referenced by
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717
are designated by the EC
for their services to act as
GATEWAYS
between businesses and consumersTHEN
European territorial GATEKEEPERS
should be designated for services acting as GATEWAYS
between citizens and computingELSE
?? guess what !!
Rewording Rephrasing & Localisation contributions in high demand !!
-
B4
IF
Big Tech
GATEKEEPERS
referenced by
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717
are designated by the EC
for their services to act as
GATEWAYS
between businesses and consumersTHEN
European territorial GATEKEEPERS
should be designated for services acting as GATEWAYS
between citizens and computingELSE
?? guess what !!
Rewording Rephrasing & Localisation contributions in high demand !!
This post is deleted! -
undefined casarayuela@mastodon.uno shared this topic on
-
B4
IF
Big Tech
GATEKEEPERS
referenced by
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717
are designated by the EC
for their services to act as
GATEWAYS
between businesses and consumersTHEN
European territorial GATEKEEPERS
should be designated for services acting as GATEWAYS
between citizens and computingELSE
?? guess what !!
Rewording Rephrasing & Localisation contributions in high demand !!
This post is deleted! -
B4
IF
Big Tech
GATEKEEPERS
referenced by
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717
are designated by the EC
for their services to act as
GATEWAYS
between businesses and consumersTHEN
European territorial GATEKEEPERS
should be designated for services acting as GATEWAYS
between citizens and computingELSE
?? guess what !!
Rewording Rephrasing & Localisation contributions in high demand !!
B5
1983 - 93
L’Europea pianifica
INTERNET come rete OSI
[Open System Interconnection]
MA NON COINVOLGE COMUNITÀ di UTENTIin un AMBIENTE OSE
[Open System Environment]
di RELAZIONE comunicativa PARITETICAUTENTE – TECNOLOGIA DIGITALE
https://www.casarayuela.eu/2026
TECNOPOLIS chiude il muro contro i Sistemi Aperti
mettendo al centro i gemelli digitali delle persone
https://tecnopolisbologna.it/PER UNA RICERCA DI VIE DI FUGA??
1)
https://pubadmin.institute/administrative-theory/open-systems-approach-environmental-influences-organizations
2)
https://www.cccb.org/en/w/articles/the-brain-and-the-paradox-of-open-systems