Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?

Fediverse
28 24 76
  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Yoooo, fediverse ecom?! I love that idea.

    And it's totally doable. Ecom has been going through a "headless" revolution for a while now, meaning way better APIs and metadata.

    There's A LOT of problems in the ecom world around product images, availavle inventory, and metadata accuracy, but it's definitely worth exploring.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    This is basically eBay.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Requires a fully funded and staffed public postal service in a county that's dismantling, privatizing, and outsourcing core components of public sector package shipping

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    The biggest problem I see is that retailers generally don't want to increase visibility for their competition. Competition usually lowers prices, good for consumers, but business is not a fan. Even in non competing markets, consumers only have a limited amount of money. That $50 you spent on clothes is $50 not spent on power tools. The main reason some sell on markets like eBay/amazon/etc is because they're so large and centralized that you can't really avoid them.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is more “warehousing and fulfillment” than it is “storefront”.

    This would be hard to replicate without immense capital.

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I mean, I buy stuff off eBay a lot, and it's often from small mom-and-pop shops. I needed new ribbon for my typewriter recently and ended up getting it from a store that just sells ink ribbons. They have an off-eBay presence too.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    A Search and streamlined payment program would be neat, but customer support and other things would have to be the responsibility of each store, so at minimum you'd have to gather stuff like contact info and return policies in a standardized way to show users

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I love this idea!

  • We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

    This is kinda the same process amazon itself went through back in the day

  • Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

    A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

  • A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

    I had a horrible Amazon experience 3 or 4 years ago and haven't shopped there since, so I'm probably remembering the time when it did work.

  • Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

    Are there any instances of this? It looks promising

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is local independt shops too, and better shipping, I just wouldnt do that to myself when amazon exists and ik I can get returns + fast shipping, you need buyers, more than a few altruistic ppl

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    Like the other comments said, it's prob on it's way to becoming it's own amazon like figure there, thats how they start out

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I think this is a good idea


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • I think there's definitely an underserved space for academics on the fediverse.

    Feed-based mechanics are not good for archival or slower (read: not always online) readers, so NodeBB actually works really well to collect that stuff and present it in less of a firehose-y format.

    For example, here's a NodeBB forum that follows the #medicine tag: https://postcall.pub

    Here on ActivityPub.Space the discussion is all ActivityPub focused and it is really really good at keeping up to date with the latest topics.

    I'd be happy to work with you to start a general science (or more topic-focused) board if you're interested...

    read more

  • you may also find a slack channel dedicated to your field.

    read more

  • I think a lot of them moved to bluesky

    facepalm

    read more

  • I think a lot of them moved to bluesky.

    Here, I would just hang out in the science communities and other relevant ones, post relevant things and follow people you're interested in.

    read more

  • Create/join communities in your field, on Mastodon follow the hashtags and most importantly feed them with posts even if no one answers or interacts, someday you’ll reach the audience you’re looking for

    read more

  • The academic meme community here is absolutely ace! But what I would also like is to communicate with other academics in my field and share the latest publication and talk about it a bit if possible with peers.

    I used to use Twitter (back when it was called Twitter) to post about my new publications. Now I use Mastodon.
    Say what you wish about the negative aspect of algorithm based feeds, I am currently finding it hard to connect with other academics whose profiles may be dispersed in the wide fediverse.

    Long story short: How do I disseminate my work and connect with other academic peers in my field on the fediverse?

    I'm study biosystems and circular economy.

    read more

  • Good on you Rimu. If NodeBB implements Activity Intents it'll be because of you.

    read more

  • There is a FEP for this - https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/3b86/fep-3b86.md it's not something dansup came up with originally. We'll see how close Pixelfed adheres to it.

    PieFed has implemented basic support for that FEP since August 2025 and I just added more today.

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • FEDIVERSE DECISION TIME

    Fediverso fediverse mastodon
    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    34 Views
    @stefano thanks. I'm pragmatic about levels of engagement here and elsewhere. Looking at other instances' local live feeds, in isolation, was … erm … I'm not sure how to describe the overall experience, but it was worth it.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    Have a nice evening, #BSDCafe Have a nice evening, #illumosCafe Have a nice evening, #FediverseWaiting for the proper time to have dinner, relaxing.https://song.link/s/51qqSdQOsPkMOvG8g09r96#Music #MastoMusic #MastoRadio #FediMusic #FediRadio #Jazz #Relax
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    16 Views
    Destroying Autocracy – November 20, 2025Welcome to this week’s “Destroying Autocracy”.It’s your source for curated news affecting democracy in the cyber arena with a focus on protecting it. That necessitates an opinionated Butlerian jihad against big tech as well as evangelizing for open-source and the Fediverse. Since big media’s journalism wing is flailing and failing in its core duty to democracy, this is also a collection of alternative reporting on the eternal battle between autocracy and democracy. We also cover the cybersecurity world. You can’t be free without safety and privacy.FYI, my opinions will be in bold. And will often involve cursing. Because humans. Especially tech bros. And fascists. Fuck ’em.The Programmer’s Fulcrum is the future (and smaller) home for a fusion of Symfony Station and Battalion. Its tagline is Devs Defending Democracy, Developing the OMN.You can sign up now and for 2025 get an email with links to each week’s Symfony Station Communiqué and Battalion “Destroying Autocracy” post along with their featured articles. And you’ll be set with TPF after the fusing in January.We are posting on the Fediverse now at @thefulcrum @thefulcrum.dev and original website content will start in 2026.Featured Item(s)Muni Town writes:I’ve been trying to write this piece for years, really ever since I finished the first version of Open Source Explained (a v2 will drop early next year). Every time I get started I’m just overwhelmed with paralyzing visions of the commentariat accusing me of WrongThink.So I drop it, because I’m tired to the bone of debating the minutae of open source definitions when the conversation we ought to be having is about power: who has it? (oligarchs), how did they get it? (monopolies & corruption), why is that a problem? (platform autocracy), and how do we the people take that power back? (protocols and open software).Understanding ownership is powerIt’s important to understand the codes in your life, because your life is made up of them. Once you understand which codes you already have access to and even the right to inspect, you can see more clearly which other codes you ought to have insight into.Nothing makes me more anxious than writing about open source licensing because nothing brings out more opinion-havers, the vast majority of whom are speaking from a point of privilege-blindess in the western world. The widespread ignorance of the deeper power struggle at play (which we’re losing) has brought the free world to the very brink, so I’m pushing past the discomfort to honor the urgency of our moment.Open Source PowerWe start and end with good news to make the middle bearable.The response to Russia’s War Crimes, Techno Feudalism, and other douchebaggery404 Media reports:Ukraine Is Jamming Russia’s ‘Superweapon’ With a SongRadio Free Europe reports:How Britain’s Disposable Vape Ban Has Boosted Ukraine’s War EffortTechCrunch reports:Five people plead guilty to helping North Koreans infiltrate US companies as ‘remote IT workers’Surveillance Tech Provide Proteir Was Hackeda16z-backed super PAC is targeting Alex Bores, sponsor of New York’s AI safety bill — he says bring it onSoftware Maxims has:How FOSS Won and Why It MattersOpen Future announces:Open Future Joins the European Network for Technological Resilience and Sovereignty404 Media reports:Airlines Will Shut Down Program That Sold Your Flights Records to GovernmentFramasoft has:Renforcez l’internet du partage en contribuant à la robustesse de FramasoftSupport our 2026 campaign!The Register reports:Latest Servo release hints at a real Rust alternative to ChromiumBrussels eyes AWS, Azure for gatekeeper tag in cloud clampdownGame over: Europol storms gaming platforms in extremist content sweepThe Guardian reports:French authorities investigate alleged Holocaust denial posts on Elon Musk’s Grok AITechPolicy Press reports:Brazil Supreme Court Ruling Redefines Framework for Platform LiabilityNeutralTechCrunch reports:Databricks co-founder argues US must go open source to beat China in AIThe Guardian reports:AI firms must be clear on risks or repeat tobacco’s mistakes, says Anthropic chiefThe Center for Democracy and Technology reports:Architects of Online Influence: How Creators, Platforms, and Policymakers Shape Political SpeechTechPolicy Press says:If Europe Wants Digital Sovereignty, It Must Reinvent Who Owns TechMIT Technology Review reports:Quantum physicists have shrunk and “de-censored” DeepSeek R1The Evil Empire (AKA Autocracy) Strikes BackCorporate Europe reports:Preparing a roll-back of digital rights: Commission’s secretive meetings with industryThe Brussels Times reports:Secret EU plans to allow Big Tech to train AI with our personal dataThe Guardian reports:Dark forces are preventing us fighting the climate crisis – by taking knowledge hostage404 Media reports:This App Lets ICE Track Vehicles and Owners Across the CountryIRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a WarrantThe Register reports:Palantir plots NHS skills drive for its controversial data platformPariah StatesTechCrunch reports:US, UK, and Australia sanction Russian ‘bulletproof’ web host used in ransomware attacksForbes reports:Has Samsung Installed ‘Unremovable Israeli Spyware’ On Your Phone?The Register reports:Tens of thousands more ASUS routers pwned by suspected, evolving China operationBig MediaTBDBig TechThe Guardian reports:White nationalist talking points and racial pseudoscience: welcome to Elon Musk’s GrokipediaThe Register reports:Researchers find hole in AI guardrails by using strings like =coffee404 Media reports:A Researcher Made an AI That Completely Breaks the Online Surveys Scientists Rely OnThe ACLU reports:Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government CensorshipYep.TechPolicy Press reports:How Tech Oligarchs Profit from the Logic of ‘Finitude Capitalism’ and What to Do About ItCybersecurity/PrivacyPrivacy Guides has:Email Security: Where We Are and What the Future HoldsDarkReading asks:Can a Global, Decentralized System Save CVE Data?Heise reports:3.5 Billion Accounts: Complete WhatsApp Directory Retrieved and EvaluatedSignal or Delta Chat peeps.FediverseBen Werdmuller reports on:The State of the Open Social WebGreat Stuff as usual from Ben.ForBetter explores:The future of hope on the Social WebConnected Places has:Fediverse Report – 142Laura Hargreaves has:Ghost v6 Upgrade + Docker Migration: What I Learned (So You Don’t Have To)Big news with Mastodon this week:My next chapter with MastodonThe Future is Ours to Build – TogetherHopefully the new regime (foundation vs. benevolent dictator) will focus on trust & safety and not trying to be Twitter 2.Chris Sturmsucht shares:Fediverse: a new open and social webSlightly Decentralized Social MediaTBDCTAs (aka show us some free love)That’s it for this week. Please share this edition of Destroying Autocracy.Follow me on the Fediverse. Or this site via the button in the footer. Or via RSS. Or even our future home in 2026, if you want a head start.Keep fighting!Ringleader, BattalionReuben Walker Follow me on the Fediverse#activitypub #ai #autocracy #bigJournalism #bigTech #democracy #fascism #fediverse #ghost #mastodon #stopChina #stopIsrael #stopRedAmerica #stopRussia #supportUkraine #technoanarchism #technofeudalismhttps://battalion.mobileatom.net/?p=3954
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    28 Views
    @chris @directory great name!