Ultimate betrayal.
Uncategorized
16
Posts
12
Posters
0
Views
-
@governa The image shows a Twitter post by user Theo ([@]theo) with the text "This is one of the wildest git diffs I've ever seen", accompanied by a GitHub - style Git diff interface. The diff indicates 7 files changed with +39 and -44 lines changed, for the file path
bedrock/firefox/templates/firefox/includes/structured-data-firefox-faq.html. On the left (deletion side), a Q&A entry shows:[@]type: 'Question', name: 'Does Firefox sell your personal data?',, with an accepted answer[@]type: 'Answer', text: 'Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.'. On the right (addition side), a new question entry appears:[@]type: 'Question', name: 'Why is Firefox so slow?',.Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Qwen3-Vl:30b
🌱 Energy used: 0.128 Wh
-
@governa this reminds me of google silently removing their 'don't be evil' mantra from their company mission statement.
-
-
permalink to the diff on the screenshot:
https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e
-
@governa I honestly wish people could stop sharing this image.
Have you checked the current version of the FAQs? Second from the top: "We never sell your personal data. "
-
@governa I’m going to be the person who says wish this had alt text so I could boost it.
-
@governa I’m going to be the person who says wish this had alt text so I could boost it.
@eobet alt text added 👍
-
@governa I honestly wish people could stop sharing this image.
Have you checked the current version of the FAQs? Second from the top: "We never sell your personal data. "
@flod "We never sell your personal data. Unlike other big tech companies that collect and profit off your personal information, we’re built with privacy as the default. We don’t know your age, gender, precise location, or other information Big Tech collects and profits from."
They're playing dumb. They have tons of (personal) metadata. Mozilla has been trying to weaken privacy for years to make money from data. As soon as the community protests loudly, they backtrack aka "clarify".
-
-
@firefoxwebdevs See, that is what I meant when I said nothing about Mozilla feels honest anymore.
-
@governa@fosstodon.org they don't realize that open source can bite them in the ass because if they do something wrong, people will just fork it and dedicate all their resource to that fork instead
-
-
@firefoxwebdevs See, that is what I meant when I said nothing about Mozilla feels honest anymore.
@pixel @firefoxwebdevs hear hear
-
@firefoxwebdevs See, that is what I meant when I said nothing about Mozilla feels honest anymore.
@pixel the communication around that commit was poor, but Firefox's commitment to privacy stands https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/.
The previous wording wasn't clear in terms of things like the Google search deal, for which Mozilla receives money, and Google does profit from advertising and user data.
-
@governa@fosstodon.org are we STILL sharing this without any context? I beg you to stop
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@mos_8502 GLM 4.7 can run in 205GB at the 2-bit quantization. Some of that can be system memory, so if you had a system with a couple of large GPUs and a ton of system RAM, you could run a very good open model...among the best, comparable to Sonnet 4.5. Still not Opus/Codex 5.2 level, but it'll write working code. https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/glm-4.7
-
@mos_8502 cheapest option a year or two ago was probably 4 3090s on a server motherboard.
-
@mos_8502 that's a quarter what it cost a year ago. 🤷
-
@mos_8502 This is not entirely accurate, but this is the cheapest way I've found to run something close to a reasonable coding model (quantized, so still not comparable to the frontier models, but comparable to frontier models from a couple years ago). Someone on YouTube coupled two of them to run a ~200GB model that gets close to modern standards. So, $4200.
A Mac Pro with 512GB of unified memory gets you in the ballpark of the frontier. (Though there aren't open models at quite that level.)
-
@swelljoe Fucking hell.
-
-
@mos_8502 LM Studio or oLlama and a nice open model
-
emptiness levels are holding at 100%
(100%) ■■■■■■■■■■
